Flanders Research Institute For Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), B-9090 Melle, Belgium; Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Flanders Research Institute For Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), B-9090 Melle, Belgium.
Poult Sci. 2021 Apr;100(4):100991. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
Salmonella contamination sources and transmission routes were studied in 5 Belgian poultry slaughterhouses. Samples from the slaughter and cutting line after cleaning and disinfection were collected, as well as neck skin samples and thighs during slaughter of the first flock. In total, 680 swab and water samples were taken from the slaughter line before slaughter. In all slaughterhouses, Salmonella was notwithstanding cleaning and disinfection still isolated from the slaughter line before start of activities. The prevalence of Salmonella in the plucking area was 10.4% (38/365) (hanging area: 5.0%, scalding tank: 5.8%, plucking machine: 17.0%); in the evisceration room, 1.5% (2/138); and in the cutting area, 2.0% (3/149). No Salmonella (0/28) was found in samples from the chilling line. On neck skin samples taken from the various lines, Salmonella prevalence was 16.1% (48/299) after plucking, 16.0% (48/300) after evisceration, 23.3% (70/300) after chilling; on thighs, prevalence was 10.0% (24/240). Nine Salmonella serotypes were identified of which Salmonella Infantis was the most common serovar (53.8%), especially in slaughterhouse A. Two contamination causes were identified; first, although all flocks had an official Salmonella negative status, this was in one case incorrect and led to an enormous contamination of the neck skins of the flock and the slaughterline (i.e., cooling water). Second, molecular typing revealed cross-contamination from flocks slaughtered 1 d before sampling. Salmonella was apparently not always eliminated by the cleaning and disinfection process and able to contaminate the carcasses of the first slaughtered flock. In conclusion, the results of this study provided practical insights for poultry production to further improve their Salmonella control, for example, Salmonella status determination closer to the slaughter date, to adapt cleaning and disinfection protocols especially for critical machinery and better hygienic designed equipment.
在 5 家比利时家禽屠宰场研究了沙门氏菌污染的来源和传播途径。采集了清洗消毒后的屠宰和切割线的样本,以及第一批家禽屠宰时的颈皮样本和大腿样本。总共在屠宰前从屠宰线上采集了 680 个拭子和水样。尽管进行了清洗和消毒,但在所有屠宰场的屠宰前活动开始前,仍然可以从屠宰线上分离出沙门氏菌。在拔毛区,沙门氏菌的流行率为 10.4%(38/365)(悬挂区:5.0%,烫池:5.8%,拔毛机:17.0%);在去脏区为 1.5%(2/138);在切割区为 2.0%(3/149)。在冷却线上未发现沙门氏菌(0/28)。在从各个屠宰线上采集的颈皮样本中,拔毛后沙门氏菌的流行率为 16.1%(48/299),去脏后为 16.0%(48/300),冷却后为 23.3%(70/300);在大腿上,流行率为 10.0%(24/240)。共鉴定出 9 种沙门氏菌血清型,其中肠炎沙门氏菌最为常见(53.8%),尤其是在屠宰场 A 中。确定了两个污染原因;首先,尽管所有的鸡群都有官方的沙门氏菌阴性状态,但在一个案例中这是不正确的,导致了鸡群的颈皮和屠宰线的巨大污染(即冷却水)。其次,分子分型显示了来自前一天屠宰的鸡群的交叉污染。沙门氏菌显然并没有总是被清洗和消毒过程消除,并且能够污染第一批屠宰鸡群的胴体。总之,这项研究的结果为家禽生产提供了实际的见解,以进一步改善他们的沙门氏菌控制,例如,更接近屠宰日期确定沙门氏菌状态,特别是对关键机器的清洁和消毒协议,以及更好的卫生设计设备。