Suppr超能文献

“医生问诊与药店购药行为”:用于监测处方阿片类药物使用情况的一个逐渐消失的信号?

"Doctor and pharmacy shopping": A fading signal for prescription opioid use monitoring?

作者信息

Delcher Chris, Harris Daniel R, Park Changwe, Strickler Gail K, Talbert Jeffery, Freeman Patricia R

机构信息

Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, Research Building 2, Ste 260, Lexington, KY, 40536-0679, United States; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, Research Building 2, Ste 260, Lexington, KY, 40536-0679, United States.

Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, Research Building 2, Ste 260, Lexington, KY, 40536-0679, United States; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, Research Building 2, Ste 260, Lexington, KY, 40536-0679, United States.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Apr 1;221:108618. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108618. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The term "doctor and pharmacy shopping" colloquially describes patients with high multiple provider episodes (MPEs)-a threshold count of distinct prescribers and/or pharmacies involved in prescription fulfillment. Opioid-related MPEs are implicated in the global opioid crisis and heavily monitored by government databases such as U.S. state prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs). We applied a widely-used MPE definition to examine U.S. trends from a large, commercially-insured population from 2010 to 2017. Further, we examined the proportion of enrollees identified as "doctor shoppers" with evidence of a cancer diagnosis to examine the risk of false positives.

METHODS

Using a large, commercially-insured population, we identified patients with opioid-related MPEs: opioid prescriptions (Schedule II-V, no buprenorphine) filled from ≥5 prescribers AND ≥ 5 pharmacies within the past 90 days ("5x5x90d"). Quarterly rates per 100,000 enrollees (two specifications) were calculated between 2010 and 2017. We examined the trend in a recently published all-payer, 7 state cohort from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for comparison. Cancer-related ICD-9/10-CM codes were used.

RESULTS

Quarterly MPE rates declined by approximately 73 % from 18.2-4.9 per 100,000 enrollee population with controlled substance prescriptions. In 2017, nearly one fifth of these commercially-insured enrollees identified by the 5x5x90d algorithm were diagnosed with cancer. Approximately 8% of this sample included patients with ≥ 1 buprenorphine prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid "shopping" flags are a long-standing but rapidly fading PDMP signal. To avoid unintended consequences, such as identifying legitimate medical encounters requiring high healthcare utilization or opioid treatment, while maintaining vigilance, more nuanced and sophisticated approaches are needed.

摘要

背景

“医生和药房购物”一词通俗地描述了具有高多次开具处方事件(MPE)的患者——即参与处方配药的不同开处方者和/或药房数量达到阈值。与阿片类药物相关的MPE与全球阿片类药物危机有关,并受到美国各州处方药监测计划(PDMP)等政府数据库的密切监测。我们应用了一个广泛使用的MPE定义,来研究2010年至2017年来自大量商业保险人群的美国趋势。此外,我们检查了被确定为“医生购物者”且有癌症诊断证据的参保人员比例,以研究假阳性风险。

方法

利用大量商业保险人群,我们确定了与阿片类药物相关的MPE患者:在过去90天内从≥5名开处方者和≥5家药房开具的阿片类药物处方(II-V类,不含丁丙诺啡)(“5x5x90d”)。计算了2010年至2017年期间每10万名参保人员的季度发生率(两种规格)。为作比较,我们研究了美国疾病控制与预防中心最近公布的一个涵盖7个州的全支付者队列中的趋势。使用了与癌症相关的ICD-9/10-CM编码。

结果

每10万名有管制物质处方的参保人员中,季度MPE发生率从18.2降至4.9,下降了约73%。2017年,通过5x5x90d算法确定的这些商业保险参保人员中,近五分之一被诊断患有癌症。该样本中约8%包括开具过≥1张丁丙诺啡处方的患者。

结论

阿片类药物“购物”标记是一个长期存在但迅速消退的PDMP信号。为避免意外后果,如识别需要高医疗利用率或阿片类药物治疗的合理医疗接触,同时保持警惕,需要更细致和复杂的方法。

相似文献

1
"Doctor and pharmacy shopping": A fading signal for prescription opioid use monitoring?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Apr 1;221:108618. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108618. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
4
Opioid Prescribing Behaviors - Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, 11 States, 2010-2016.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020 Jan 31;69(1):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6901a1.
5
Assessing opioid shopping behaviour: a large cohort study from a medication dispensing database in the US.
Drug Saf. 2012 Apr 1;35(4):325-34. doi: 10.2165/11596600-000000000-00000.
6
Mapping prescription drug monitoring program data to self-report measures of non-medical prescription opioid use in community pharmacy settings.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Aug;19(8):1171-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.04.121. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
7
Physician attitudes and experiences with Maryland's prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP).
Addiction. 2017 Feb;112(2):311-319. doi: 10.1111/add.13620. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
Assessment of Prescriber and Pharmacy Shopping Among the Family Members of Patients Prescribed Opioids.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193673. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3673.
9
Distance traveled and frequency of interstate opioid dispensing in opioid shoppers and nonshoppers.
J Pain. 2013 Oct;14(10):1158-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
10
Systematic Evaluation of State Policy Interventions Targeting the US Opioid Epidemic, 2007-2018.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36687.

引用本文的文献

1
Paths Forward for Clinicians Amidst the Rise of Unregulated Clinical Decision Support Software: Our Perspective on NarxCare.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Apr;39(5):858-862. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08528-2. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Assessing the Impact of Indiana Public Law 194 on Curbing the Concurrent Opioid Prescribing for Indiana Medicaid Enrollees.
Subst Abuse. 2023 Apr 20;17:11782218231168722. doi: 10.1177/11782218231168722. eCollection 2023.
3
Prevalence of pain and use of prescription opioids among older adults: results from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil).
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Mar 1;20:100459. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100459. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
The Role of the Pharmacist in Combating the Opioid Crisis: An Update.
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2022 Dec 28;13:127-138. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S351096. eCollection 2022.
5
7
Did prescribing laws disproportionately affect opioid dispensing to Black patients?
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):482-496. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13968. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
8
The Prescription of Drug Ontology 2.0 (PDRO): More Than the Sum of Its Parts.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;18(22):12025. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212025.

本文引用的文献

2
Deficiencies with the Use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program in Cancer Pain Management: A Report of Two Cases.
J Palliat Med. 2021 May;24(5):751-754. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0537. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
4
A History of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs in the United States: Political Appeal and Public Health Efficacy.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1191-1197. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305696. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Opioid prescription patterns among patients who doctor shop; Implications for providers.
PLoS One. 2020 May 26;15(5):e0232533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232533. eCollection 2020.
6
Multiple opioid prescribers: A genuine quest for treatment rather than aberrant behaviour. A two-decade population-based study.
Addict Behav. 2020 Sep;108:106458. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106458. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
8
Managing Cancer Pain During the Opioid Epidemic-Balancing Caution and Compassion.
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1103-1104. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0779.
10
Variation in Adult Outpatient Opioid Prescription Dispensing by Age and Sex - United States, 2008-2018.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 20;69(11):298-302. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6911a5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验