Suppr超能文献

非标准可调节风险因素的 STEMI 患者的死亡率:SWEDEHEART 注册研究数据的性别细分分析。

Mortality in STEMI patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a sex-disaggregated analysis of SWEDEHEART registry data.

机构信息

Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1085-1094. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00272-5. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In cardiovascular disease, prevention strategies targeting standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs; hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, and smoking) are crucial; however, myocardial infarction in the absence of SMuRFs is not infrequent. The outcomes of individuals without SMuRFs are not well known.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed adult patients with first-presentation ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using data from the Swedish myocardial infarction registry SWEDEHEART. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients (age ≥18 years) with and without SMuRFs were examined overall and by sex. Patients with a known history of coronary artery disease were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days after STEMI presentation. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and myocardial infarction at30 days. Endpoints were also examined up to discharge, and to the end of a 12-year follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare in-hospital mortality, and Cox-proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier analysis for long-term outcomes.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 1, 2005, and May 25, 2018, 9228 (14·9%) of 62 048 patients with STEMI had no SMuRFs reaching diagnostic thresholds. Median age was similar between patients with SMuRFs and patients without SMuRFs (68 years [IQR 59-78]) vs 69 years [60-78], p<0·0001). SMuRF-less patients had a similar rate of percutaneous coronary intervention to those with at least one modifiable risk factor, but were significantly less likely to receive statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockade (ARB), or β-blockers at discharge. By 30 days after presentation, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in SMuRF-less patients (hazard ratio 1·47 [95% CI 1·37-1·57], p<0·0001). SMuRF-less women had the highest 30-day mortality (381 [17·6%] of 2164), followed by women with SMuRFs (2032 [11·1%] of 18 220), SMuRF-less men (660 [9·3%] of 7064), and men with SMuRFs (2117 [6·1%] of 34 600). The increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality in SMuRF-less patients remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, creatinine, and blood pressure, but was attenuated on inclusion of pharmacotherapy prescription (ACEI or ARB, β-blocker, or statin) at discharge. Additionally, SMuRF-less patients had a significantly higher rate of in-hospital all-cause mortality than patients with one or more SMuRF (883 [9·6%] vs 3411 [6·5%], p<0·0001). Myocardial infarction and heart failure at 30 days were lower in SMuRF-less patients. All-cause mortality remained increased in the SMuRF-less group for more than 8 years in men and up to the 12-year endpoint in women.

INTERPRETATION

Individuals who present with STEMI in the absence of SMuRFs have a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, compared with those with at least one SMuRF, which was particularly evident in women. The increased early mortality rates are attenuated after adjustment for use of guideline-indicated treatments, highlighting the need for evidence-based pharmacotherapy during the immediate post-infarct period irrespective of perceived low risk.

FUNDING

Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia).

摘要

背景

在心血管疾病中,针对标准可改变心血管风险因素(SMuRFs;高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症和吸烟)的预防策略至关重要;然而,心肌梗死在没有 SMuRFs 的情况下并不少见。没有 SMuRFs 的个体的结局尚不清楚。

方法

我们使用来自瑞典心肌梗死注册中心 SWEDEHEART 的数据,回顾性分析了首次出现 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的成年患者。总体和按性别检查了有和没有 SMuRFs 的成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)的临床特征和结局。排除了已知有冠状动脉疾病病史的患者。主要结局是 STEMI 发病后 30 天的全因死亡率。次要结局包括 30 天的心血管死亡率、心力衰竭和心肌梗死。终点也在出院时和 12 年随访结束时进行了检查。多变量逻辑回归模型用于比较住院死亡率,Cox 比例风险模型和 Kaplan-Meier 分析用于长期结局。

结果

2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 5 月 25 日,62048 例 STEMI 患者中有 9228 例(14.9%)没有达到可改变的风险因素诊断标准。有 SMuRFs 和没有 SMuRFs 的患者的中位年龄相似(68 岁[IQR 59-78] vs 69 岁[60-78],p<0.0001)。无 SMuRFs 的患者与至少有一种可改变风险因素的患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比率相似,但出院时接受他汀类药物、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)或β受体阻滞剂的可能性显著降低。在发病后 30 天,无 SMuRFs 的患者全因死亡率明显较高(风险比 1.47[95%CI 1.37-1.57],p<0.0001)。无 SMuRFs 的女性 30 天死亡率最高(2164 例中的 381 例[17.6%]),其次是有 SMuRFs 的女性(18220 例中的 2032 例[11.1%]),无 SMuRFs 的男性(7064 例中的 660 例[9.3%]),以及有 SMuRFs 的男性(34600 例中的 2117 例[6.1%])。在调整年龄、性别、左心室射血分数、肌酐和血压后,无 SMuRFs 的患者 30 天全因死亡率的风险仍然显著增加,但在包括出院时的药物治疗处方(ACEI 或 ARB、β受体阻滞剂或他汀类药物)后,风险有所减弱。此外,无 SMuRFs 的患者住院期间全因死亡率明显高于有一个或多个 SMuRF 的患者(883 例[9.6%]比 3411 例[6.5%],p<0.0001)。无 SMuRFs 的患者 30 天的心肌梗死和心力衰竭发生率较低。在男性中,无 SMuRFs 的患者在超过 8 年的时间里,全因死亡率仍然增加,在女性中,直到 12 年的终点。

结论

与至少有一种 SMuRF 的患者相比,首次出现 STEMI 且无 SMuRFs 的个体全因死亡率明显升高,这在女性中尤为明显。调整指南推荐治疗方法的使用后,早期死亡率的增加幅度有所减弱,这突出表明,无论认为风险低,都需要在心肌梗死后立即进行基于证据的药物治疗。

资金

瑞典心脏和肺基金会、澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验