Lab of Toxicology, Department of Health Sciences, The Graduate School of Dong-A University, 37, Nakdong-daero 550 Beon-gil, Saha-gu, Busan, 49315, Republic of Korea.
Department of Applied Chemistry, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, 17104, Republic of Korea.
Environ Pollut. 2021 Jul 15;281:117006. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117006. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
The presence of microplastics in the various food web raised concerns on human health, but little is known about the target cells and mechanism of toxicity of microplastics. In this study, we evaluated the toxicity of microplastics using relevant cell lines to the oral route of exposure. Approximately 100 μm-sized fragment-type polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) particles were prepared by sieving after pulverization and further applied the accelerated weathering using ultraviolet and heat. Thus, the panel of microplastics includes fresh PP (f-PP), fresh PS (f-PS), weathered PP (w-PP), and weathered PS (w-PS). The spherical PS with a similar size was used as a reference particle. Treatment of all types of PP and PS did not show any toxic effects to the Caco-2 cells and HepG2 cells. However, the treatment of microplastics to THP-1 macrophages showed significant toxicity in the order of f-PS > f-PP > w-PS > w-PP. The weathering process significantly reduced the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation potential of both microplastics because the weathered microplastics have an increased affinity to bind serum protein which acts as a ROS scavenger. The intrinsic ROS generation potential of microplastics showed a good correlation with the toxicity endpoints including cytotoxicity and pro-inflammatory cytokines in THP-1 macrophages. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the target cell type of microplastics via oral administration can be macrophages and the pathogenic factor to THP-1 macrophages is the intrinsic ROS generation potential of microplastics. Nevertheless, the toxic effect of microplastics tested in this study was much less than that of nano-sized particles.
微塑料存在于各种食物网中,引起了人们对人类健康的关注,但对于微塑料的靶细胞和毒性机制知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们使用与口腔暴露途径相关的细胞系来评估微塑料的毒性。大约 100μm 大小的碎片型聚丙烯(PP)和聚苯乙烯(PS)颗粒通过粉碎后筛分制备,并进一步使用紫外线和热进行加速风化。因此,微塑料组包括新鲜 PP(f-PP)、新鲜 PS(f-PS)、风化 PP(w-PP)和风化 PS(w-PS)。具有相似尺寸的球形 PS 被用作参考颗粒。所有类型的 PP 和 PS 的处理均未显示出对 Caco-2 细胞和 HepG2 细胞的任何毒性作用。然而,微塑料处理 THP-1 巨噬细胞显示出明显的毒性,顺序为 f-PS>f-PP>w-PS>w-PP。风化过程显著降低了两种微塑料的活性氧(ROS)产生潜力,因为风化的微塑料对结合血清蛋白的亲和力增加,而血清蛋白是一种 ROS 清除剂。微塑料的内在 ROS 产生潜力与毒性终点(包括 THP-1 巨噬细胞的细胞毒性和促炎细胞因子)具有良好的相关性。总之,这项研究的结果表明,通过口服给予微塑料的靶细胞类型可以是巨噬细胞,而 THP-1 巨噬细胞的致病因素是微塑料的内在 ROS 产生潜力。然而,本研究中测试的微塑料的毒性作用远小于纳米级颗粒。