Suppr超能文献

社会经济劣势与儿童生物老化速度。

Socioeconomic Disadvantage and the Pace of Biological Aging in Children.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and

Population Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2021 Jun;147(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-024406. Epub 2021 May 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Children who grow up in socioeconomic disadvantage face increased burden of disease and disability throughout their lives. One hypothesized mechanism for this increased burden is that early-life disadvantage accelerates biological processes of aging, increasing vulnerability to subsequent disease. To evaluate this hypothesis and the potential impact of preventive interventions, measures are needed that can quantify early acceleration of biological aging in childhood.

METHODS

Saliva DNA methylation and socioeconomic circumstances were measured in = 600 children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years (48% female) participating in the Texas Twin Project. We measured pace of biological aging using the DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm, developed to quantify the pace-of-aging-related decline in system integrity. We tested if children in more disadvantaged families and neighborhoods exhibited a faster pace of aging as compared with children in more affluent contexts.

RESULTS

Children living in more disadvantaged families and neighborhoods exhibited a faster DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging ( = 0.18; = .001 for both). Latinx-identifying children exhibited a faster DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging compared with both White- and Latinx White-identifying children, consistent with higher levels of disadvantage in this group. Children with more advanced pubertal development, higher BMI, and more tobacco exposure exhibited faster a faster DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging. However, DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging associations with socioeconomic disadvantage were robust to control for these factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Children growing up under conditions of socioeconomic disadvantage exhibit a faster pace of biological aging. DNA methylation pace of aging might be useful as a surrogate end point in evaluation of programs and policies to address the childhood social determinants of lifelong health disparities.

摘要

背景和目的

在社会经济劣势中成长的儿童在其一生中面临着更多的疾病和残疾负担。这种负担增加的一个假设机制是,早期生活劣势加速了衰老的生物学过程,增加了随后患病的脆弱性。为了评估这一假设以及预防干预的潜在影响,需要有能够量化儿童期生物衰老早期加速的措施。

方法

在德克萨斯州双胞胎项目中,我们测量了 600 名 8 至 18 岁(48%为女性)的儿童和青少年的唾液 DNA 甲基化和社会经济状况。我们使用 DunedinPoAm DNA 甲基化算法测量生物衰老的速度,该算法用于量化与系统完整性相关的衰老速度下降。我们测试了生活在较贫困家庭和社区的儿童是否比生活在较富裕环境中的儿童表现出更快的衰老速度。

结果

生活在较贫困家庭和社区的儿童表现出更快的 DunedinPoAm 测量的衰老速度( = 0.18;两者均为 =.001)。与白人及白人和拉丁裔混合身份的儿童相比,拉丁裔身份的儿童表现出更快的 DunedinPoAm 测量的衰老速度,这与该群体中较高的劣势水平一致。青春期发育较早、BMI 较高和吸烟较多的儿童表现出更快的 DunedinPoAm 测量的衰老速度。然而,控制这些因素后,DunedinPoAm 测量的与社会经济劣势相关的衰老速度仍然存在。

结论

在社会经济劣势中成长的儿童表现出更快的生物衰老速度。DNA 甲基化衰老速度可能是评估解决儿童期终身健康差异的社会决定因素的计划和政策的替代终点。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Disadvantage and the Pace of Biological Aging in Children.
Pediatrics. 2021 Jun;147(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-024406. Epub 2021 May 17.
3
Socioeconomic Status, Biological Aging, and Memory in a Diverse National Sample of Older US Men and Women.
Neurology. 2022 Nov 8;99(19):e2114-e2124. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201032. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
Associations Between Life-Course Socioeconomic Conditions and the Pace of Aging.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Nov 21;77(11):2257-2264. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab383.
6
Associations of socioeconomic disparities with buccal DNA-methylation measures of biological aging.
Clin Epigenetics. 2023 Apr 28;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01489-7.
7
Associations of DNA-methylation measures of biological aging with social disparities in child and adolescent mental health.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2024 Jul;12(4):551-562. doi: 10.1177/21677026231186802. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
8
Integrating DNA Methylation Measures of Biological Aging into Social Determinants of Health Research.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2022 Jun;9(2):196-210. doi: 10.1007/s40572-022-00338-8. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
9
Association of Neighborhood Disadvantage in Childhood With DNA Methylation in Young Adulthood.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206095. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6095.

引用本文的文献

2
Epigenetic regulation of brain development, plasticity, and response to early-life stress.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02179-z.
3
Early-Life Adversity and Epigenetic Aging: Findings from a 17-Year Longitudinal Study.
Biomolecules. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):887. doi: 10.3390/biom15060887.
4
Health insurance and epigenetic aging: Trends in a United States adult population.
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Apr 23;30:101806. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101806. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Epigenetic biomarkers of socioeconomic status are associated with age-related chronic diseases and mortality in older adults.
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Apr 16;4(4):pgaf121. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf121. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
Stability of Aging- and Cognition-Related Methylation Profile Scores Across Two Waves in Children and Adolescents.
Child Dev. 2025 May-Jun;96(3):1189-1206. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14239. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
9
Association of polysocial risk score, cardiovascular health status, and the risk of premature mortality: Findings from the UK Biobank.
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 May;29(5):100527. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100527. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
10
Childhood adversity and adolescent epigenetic age acceleration: the role of adolescent sleep health.
Sleep Adv. 2025 Jan 31;6(1):zpaf003. doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf003. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Stress-Related Biosocial Mechanisms of Discrimination and African American Health Inequities.
Annu Rev Sociol. 2018 Jul;44(1):319-340. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053403. Epub 2018 May 16.
2
Social inequalities in health of children and adolescents in Germany. Results of the cross-sectional KiGGS Wave 2 study.
J Health Monit. 2018 Sep 19;3(3):17-33. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-083. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
The Ground Zero of Organismal Life and Aging.
Trends Mol Med. 2021 Jan;27(1):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
Social determinants of health and survival in humans and other animals.
Science. 2020 May 22;368(6493). doi: 10.1126/science.aax9553.
7
Determining the Optimal Outcome Measures for Studying the Social Determinants of Health.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 27;17(9):3028. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093028.
8
Current perspectives on the cellular and molecular features of epigenetic ageing.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2020 Nov;245(17):1532-1542. doi: 10.1177/1535370220918329. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
9
Childhood maltreatment and DNA methylation: A systematic review.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:392-409. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.019. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
10
Adversity exposure during sensitive periods predicts accelerated epigenetic aging in children.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020 Mar;113:104484. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104484. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验