Suppr超能文献

美国成年人糖尿病治疗和控制的趋势,1999-2018 年。

Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.

机构信息

From the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research and the Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Documenting current trends in diabetes treatment and risk-factor control may inform public health policy and planning.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from adults with diabetes in the United States participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to assess national trends in diabetes treatment and risk-factor control from 1999 through 2018.

RESULTS

Diabetes control improved from 1999 to the early 2010s among the participants but subsequently stalled and declined. Between the 2007-2010 period and the 2015-2018 period, the percentage of adult NHANES participants with diabetes in whom glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin level, <7%) was achieved declined from 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.9 to 61.8) to 50.5% (95% CI, 45.8 to 55.3). After major improvements in lipid control (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, <130 mg per deciliter) in the early 2000s, minimal improvement was seen from 2007-2010 (52.3%; 95% CI, 49.2 to 55.3) to 2015-2018 (55.7%; 95% CI, 50.8 to 60.5). From 2011-2014 to 2015-2018, the percentage of participants in whom blood-pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) was achieved decreased from 74.2% (95% CI, 70.7 to 77.4) to 70.4% (95% CI, 66.7 to 73.8). The percentage of participants in whom all three targets were simultaneously achieved plateaued after 2010 and was 22.2% (95% CI, 17.9 to 27.3) in 2015-2018. The percentages of participants who used any glucose-lowering medication or any blood-pressure-lowering medication were unchanged after 2010, and the percentage who used statins plateaued after 2014. After 2010, the use of combination therapy declined in participants with uncontrolled blood pressure and plateaued for those with poor glycemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

After more than a decade of progress from 1999 to the early 2010s, glycemic and blood-pressure control declined in adult NHANES participants with diabetes, while lipid control leveled off. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).

摘要

背景

记录糖尿病治疗和风险因素控制方面的当前趋势,可能有助于制定公共卫生政策和规划。

方法

我们对参与美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)的糖尿病成年患者的数据进行了横断面分析,以评估 1999 年至 2018 年期间糖尿病治疗和风险因素控制方面的全国趋势。

结果

在参与者中,糖尿病控制情况从 1999 年至 2010 年初有所改善,但随后停滞不前并出现下降。在 2007-2010 年期间和 2015-2018 年期间,NHANES 参与者中血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白水平,<7%)达到目标的成年人比例从 57.4%(95%置信区间[CI],52.9 至 61.8)下降至 50.5%(95%CI,45.8 至 55.3)。在 2000 年代初血脂控制(非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平,<130mg/dL)取得重大改善后,从 2007-2010 年(52.3%;95%CI,49.2 至 55.3)到 2015-2018 年(55.7%;95%CI,50.8 至 60.5),仅有微小改善。从 2011-2014 年到 2015-2018 年,血压控制(<140/90mmHg)达到目标的参与者比例从 74.2%(95%CI,70.7 至 77.4)降至 70.4%(95%CI,66.7 至 73.8)。2010 年后,同时达到三个目标的参与者比例趋于平稳,在 2015-2018 年为 22.2%(95%CI,17.9 至 27.3)。2010 年后,使用任何降糖药物或任何降压药物的参与者比例保持不变,使用他汀类药物的比例在 2014 年后趋于平稳。在 2010 年后,血压控制未达标的参与者中联合治疗的使用有所下降,血糖控制不佳的参与者中联合治疗的使用则保持平稳。

结论

在 1999 年至 2010 年初取得超过十年的进展之后,NHANES 中患有糖尿病的成年参与者的血糖和血压控制情况恶化,而血脂控制水平则趋于平稳。(由美国国家心肺血液研究所资助)。

相似文献

1
Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.
3
Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999-2010.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 25;368(17):1613-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1213829.
5
Mortality associated with less intense risk-factor control among adults with diabetes in the United States.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2018 Feb;12(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
6
Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):465-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00005.
7
Trends in lipid profiles and control of LDL-C among adults with diabetes in the United States: An analysis of NHANES 2007-2018.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Jul;33(7):1367-1376. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

2
Quantifying lifetime risk for 1,401 infectious diseases across the diabetes spectrum using a Bayesian approach.
medRxiv. 2025 Aug 24:2025.08.20.25334110. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.20.25334110.
7
Trends and Disparities in Deaths from Kidney Disease Among Older Adults in the United States.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 12;14(14):4950. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144950.
9
A Call for Patient-Centered Care: Medication Selection in Type 2 Diabetes.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09751-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Glucose-Lowering Drugs to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 1;384(13):1248-1260. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2000280.
2
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: .
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S125-S150. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S010.
3
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S111-S124. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S009.
4
Changes in Statin Use Among U.S. Adults With Diabetes: A Population-Based Analysis of NHANES 2011-2018.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Dec;43(12):3110-3112. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1481. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
5
The High Cost of Diabetes Drugs: Disparate Impact on the Most Vulnerable Patients.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Oct;43(10):2330-2332. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0039.
6
Trends in Blood Pressure Control Among US Adults With Hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018.
JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1190-1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14545.
7
Use of Antihyperglycemic Medications in U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jun;43(6):1227-1233. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2424. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
9
Evaluation of the Cascade of Diabetes Care in the United States, 2005-2016.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1376-1385. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2396.
10
Resurgence in Diabetes-Related Complications.
JAMA. 2019 May 21;321(19):1867-1868. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3471.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验