Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Caries Res. 2021;55(4):268-287. doi: 10.1159/000516137. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to document the disparity in dental caries experiences among indigenous and nonindigenous populations globally by measuring dental caries prevalence and severity. An electronic database (MEDLINE) was initially searched using relevant keywords. This was followed by use of the search string in the following electronic databases: Scopus, EBSCOhost, Cochrane, and Open Grey. Two independent reviewers conducted the study search and screening, quality assessment, and data extraction, which was facilitated using JBI SUMARI software. The primary outcome was the decayed missing filled teeth (DMFT) score and dental caries prevalence. Subgroup analysis was done by country of publication to identify causes of heterogeneity. Forest plots were used with the standardized mean difference (SMD) and publication bias was assessed using the Egger test with funnel plot construction. For the final review, 43 articles were selected and 34 were meta-analyzed. The pooled mean DMFT for both the permanent dentition (SMD = 0.26; 95% CI 0.13-0.39) and deciduous dentition (SMD = 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.87) was higher for the Indigenous population than for the general population. Indigenous populations experienced more decayed teeth (SMD = 0.44; 95% CI 0.25-0.62), a slightly higher number of missing teeth (SMD = 0.11< 95% CI -0.05 to 0.26), and lesser filled teeth (SMD = -0.04; 95% CI -0.20 to 0.13) than their nonindigenous counterparts. The prevalence of dental caries (SMD = 0.27; 95% CI 0.13-0.41) was higher among indigenous people. Globally, indigenous populations have a higher caries prevalence and severity than nonindigenous populations. The factors which have led to such inequities need to be examined.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是通过测量龋齿患病率和严重程度来记录全球土著和非土著人群的龋齿差异。最初使用相关关键字在电子数据库 (MEDLINE) 中进行搜索。然后,在以下电子数据库中使用搜索字符串:Scopus、EBSCOhost、Cochrane 和 Open Grey。两名独立评审员进行了研究搜索和筛选、质量评估以及使用 JBI SUMARI 软件进行的数据提取。主要结果是龋齿失补牙数 (DMFT) 评分和龋齿患病率。通过出版国家进行亚组分析,以确定异质性的原因。使用标准化均数差 (SMD) 绘制森林图,并使用 Egger 检验和漏斗图构建评估发表偏倚。最终审查选择了 43 篇文章,其中 34 篇进行了荟萃分析。恒牙列 (SMD = 0.26; 95%CI 0.13-0.39) 和乳牙列 (SMD = 0.67; 95%CI 0.47-0.87) 的土著人群 DMFT 平均值均高于普通人群。土著人群的龋齿数更多 (SMD = 0.44; 95%CI 0.25-0.62)、缺失牙数略多 (SMD = 0.11<95%CI -0.05 至 0.26) 和填充牙数较少 (SMD = -0.04; 95%CI -0.20 至 0.13)。龋齿患病率 (SMD = 0.27; 95%CI 0.13-0.41) 在土著人群中更高。总体而言,土著人群的龋齿患病率和严重程度高于非土著人群。需要检查导致这种不平等的因素。