Suppr超能文献

患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。

Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.

机构信息

The Department Community Health Sciences, Calgary, AB, Canada.

O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of patient involvement in health research has evolved over the past decade. Despite efforts to engage patients as partners, the role is not well understood. We undertook this review to understand the engagement practices of patients who assume roles as partners in health research.

METHODS

Using a recognized methodological approach, two academic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) and grey literature sources were searched. Findings were organized into one of the three higher levels of engagement, described by the Patient and Researcher Engagement framework developed by Manafo. We examined and quantified the supportive strategies used during involvement, used thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke and themed the purpose of engagement, and categorized the reported outcomes according to the CIHR Engagement Framework.

RESULTS

Out of 6621 records, 119 sources were included in the review. Thematic analysis of the purpose of engagement revealed five themes: documenting and advancing PPI, relevance of research, co-building, capacity building and impact on research. Improved research design was the most common reported outcome and the most common role for patient partners was as members of the research team, and the most commonly used strategy to support involvement was by meetings.

CONCLUSION

The evidence collected during this review advanced our understanding of the engagement of patients as research partners. As patient involvement becomes more mainstream, this knowledge will aid researchers and policy-makers in the development of approaches and tools to support engagement.

PATIENT/USER INVOLVEMENT: Patients led and conducted the grey literature search, including the synthesis and interpretation of the findings.

摘要

背景

在过去的十年中,患者参与健康研究的角色发生了演变。尽管努力让患者作为合作伙伴参与其中,但对这一角色的理解仍不透彻。我们进行了这项综述,以了解在健康研究中担任合作伙伴角色的患者的参与实践。

方法

使用公认的方法学方法,对两个学术数据库(MEDLINE 和 EMBASE)和灰色文献来源进行了搜索。研究结果按照 Manafo 开发的患者和研究人员参与框架中的三个较高层次之一进行组织。我们检查并量化了参与过程中使用的支持策略,采用 Braun 和 Clarke 描述的主题分析方法,并对参与的目的进行主题化,根据加拿大卫生研究院(CIHR)参与框架对报告的结果进行分类。

结果

在 6621 条记录中,有 119 条来源被纳入了综述。对参与目的的主题分析揭示了五个主题:记录和推进 PPI、研究的相关性、共同构建、能力建设和对研究的影响。改进研究设计是最常报告的结果,患者伙伴最常见的角色是研究团队成员,最常用的支持参与的策略是会议。

结论

本综述中收集的证据增进了我们对患者作为研究伙伴的参与的理解。随着患者参与变得更加主流,这方面的知识将有助于研究人员和政策制定者开发支持参与的方法和工具。

患者/用户参与:患者主导并进行了灰色文献搜索,包括对发现的综合和解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/555a/8369093/54fcb2aaefa1/HEX-24-1378-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验