Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
School of Public Health and Health Systems and Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 26;16(7):e0254573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254573. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led hospital-to-home transitional care intervention versus usual care on mental functioning (primary outcome), physical functioning, depressive symptoms, anxiety, perceived social support, patient experience, and health service use costs in older adults with multimorbidity (≥ 2 comorbidities) and depressive symptoms.
Pragmatic multi-site randomized controlled trial conducted in three communities in Ontario, Canada. Participants were allocated into two groups of intervention and usual care (control).
127 older adults (≥ 65 years) discharged from hospital to the community with multimorbidity and depressive symptoms.
This evidence-based, patient-centred intervention consisted of individually tailored care delivery by a Registered Nurse comprising in-home visits, telephone follow-up and system navigation support over 6-months.
The primary outcome was the change in mental functioning, from baseline to 6-months. Secondary outcomes were the change in physical functioning, depressive symptoms, anxiety, perceived social support, patient experience, and health service use cost, from baseline to 6-months. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed using ANCOVA modeling.
Of 127 enrolled participants (63-intervention, 64-control), 85% had six or more chronic conditions. 28 participants were lost to follow-up, leaving 99 (47 -intervention, 52-control) participants for the complete case analysis. No significant group differences were seen for the baseline to six-month change in mental functioning or other secondary outcomes. Older adults in the intervention group reported receiving more information about health and social services (p = 0.03) compared with the usual care group.
Although no significant group differences were seen for the primary or secondary outcomes, the intervention resulted in improvements in one aspect of patient experience (information about health and social services). The study sample fell below the target sample (enrolled 127, targeted 216), which can account for the non-significant findings. Further research on the impact of the intervention and factors that contribute to the results is recommended.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03157999.
评估护士主导的医院到家庭过渡护理干预与常规护理相比,对患有多种合并症(≥2 种合并症)和抑郁症状的老年人的精神功能(主要结局)、身体功能、抑郁症状、焦虑、感知社会支持、患者体验和卫生服务使用成本的有效性。
在加拿大安大略省的三个社区进行的实用多站点随机对照试验。参与者被分配到干预组和常规护理(对照组)两组。
127 名从医院出院到社区的患有多种合并症和抑郁症状的老年人(≥65 岁)。
这项基于证据的、以患者为中心的干预措施包括由注册护士提供的个性化护理,包括 6 个月内的家访、电话随访和系统导航支持。
主要结局是从基线到 6 个月时精神功能的变化。次要结局是从基线到 6 个月时身体功能、抑郁症状、焦虑、感知社会支持、患者体验和卫生服务使用成本的变化。采用协方差分析模型进行意向治疗分析。
在 127 名入组参与者(63 名干预组,64 名对照组)中,85%有 6 种或更多的慢性疾病。28 名参与者失访,99 名(47 名干预组,52 名对照组)参与者进行了完整病例分析。在精神功能或其他次要结局的从基线到 6 个月的变化方面,两组间无显著差异。与常规护理组相比,干预组的老年人报告说收到了更多关于健康和社会服务的信息(p = 0.03)。
尽管主要或次要结局方面没有显著的组间差异,但干预措施导致了患者体验的一个方面(健康和社会服务信息)的改善。研究样本低于目标样本(入组 127 人,目标 216 人),这可能导致了非显著发现。建议进一步研究干预措施的影响和导致结果的因素。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT03157999。