Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术围手术期脑和血流动力学监测的变化。

Variation in perioperative cerebral and hemodynamic monitoring during carotid endarterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Nov;77:153-163. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemodynamic disturbances cause half of the perioperative strokes following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Guidelines strongly recommend strict pre- and postoperative blood pressure (BP) monitoring in CEA patients, but do not provide firm practical recommendations. Although in the Netherlands 50 centres perform CEA, no national protocol on perioperative hemodynamic, and cerebral monitoring exists. To assess current monitoring policies of all Dutch CEA-centres, a national survey was conducted.

METHODS

Between May and July 2017 all 50 Dutch CEA-centres were invited to complete a 42-question survey addressing perioperative hemodynamic and cerebral monitoring during CEA. Nonresponders received a reminder after 1 and 2 months. By November 2017 the survey was completed by all centres.

RESULTS

Preoperative baseline BP was based on a single bilateral BP-measurement at the outpatient-clinic in the majority of centres (n = 28). In 43 centres (86%) pre-operative monitoring (transcranial Doppler (TCD, n = 6), electroencephalography (EEG, n = 11), or TCD + EEG (n = 26)) was performed as a baseline reference. Intraoperatively, large diversity for type of anaesthesia (general: 45 vs. local [LA]:5) and target systolic BP (>100 mm hg - 160 mm hg [n = 12], based on preoperative outpatient-clinic or admission BP [n = 18], other [n = 20]) was reported. Intraoperative cerebral monitoring included EEG + TCD (n = 28), EEG alone (n = 13), clinical neurological examination with LA (n = 5), near-infrared spectroscopy with stump pressure (n = 1), and none due to standard shunting (n = 3). Postoperatively, significant variation was reported in standard duration of admission at a recovery or high-care unit (range 3-48 hr, mean:12 hr), maximum accepted systolic BP (range >100 mm hg - 180 mm Hg [n = 32]), postoperative cerebral monitoring (standard TCD [n = 16], TCD on indication [n = 5] or none [n = 24]) and in timing of postoperative cerebral monitoring (range directly postoperative - 24 hr postoperative; median 3 hr).

CONCLUSIONS

In Dutch centres performing CEA the perioperative hemodynamic and cerebral monitoring policies are widely diverse. Diverse policies may theoretically lead to over- or under treatment. The results of this national audit may serve as the baseline dataset for development of a standardized and detailed (inter)national protocol on perioperative hemodynamic and cerebral monitoring during CEA.

摘要

背景

血流动力学紊乱导致半数颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)围手术期中风。指南强烈建议 CEA 患者进行严格的术前和术后血压(BP)监测,但并未提供明确的实用建议。尽管荷兰有 50 个中心进行 CEA,但不存在围手术期血流动力学和脑监测的国家方案。为了评估所有荷兰 CEA 中心的当前监测政策,进行了一项全国性调查。

方法

2017 年 5 月至 7 月,邀请所有 50 个荷兰 CEA 中心完成一项针对 CEA 期间围手术期血流动力学和脑监测的 42 个问题的调查。未回复者在 1 个月和 2 个月后收到提醒。截至 2017 年 11 月,所有中心均完成了调查。

结果

大多数中心(n = 28)以门诊双侧血压测量的单次值作为术前基础血压。在 43 个中心(86%)中,进行了术前监测(经颅多普勒(TCD,n = 6)、脑电图(EEG,n = 11)或 TCD + EEG(n = 26))作为基线参考。术中,麻醉类型差异很大(全身麻醉:45 例,局部麻醉[LA]:5 例),目标收缩压也不同(>100mmHg-160mmHg[n = 12],基于术前门诊或入院时血压[n = 18],其他[n = 20])。术中脑监测包括 EEG + TCD(n = 28)、EEG 单独(n = 13)、LA 下的临床神经检查(n = 5)、近红外光谱与残端压力(n = 1),以及由于标准分流而无监测(n = 3)。术后,恢复或高护理病房的标准住院时间(范围 3-48 小时,平均 12 小时)、最大可接受的收缩压(范围>100mmHg-180mmHg[n = 32])、术后脑监测(标准 TCD[n = 16]、根据需要进行 TCD[n = 5]或无监测[n = 24])和术后脑监测时间(范围直接术后-24 小时术后;中位数 3 小时)存在显著差异。

结论

在荷兰进行 CEA 的中心,围手术期血流动力学和脑监测政策差异很大。不同的政策可能会导致过度或不足治疗。该国家审计的结果可以作为制定围手术期血流动力学和脑监测标准化和详细(国际)方案的基础数据集。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验