Suppr超能文献

添加雷莫芦单抗或默沙替尼联合标准一线化疗治疗局部晚期或转移性胆道癌:一项随机、双盲、多中心、Ⅱ期研究。

Addition of ramucirumab or merestinib to standard first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2 study.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Sciences and Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2021 Oct;22(10):1468-1482. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00409-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers are aggressive, rare, gastrointestinal malignancies with a poor prognosis; approximately half of patients with these cancers survive for less than 1 year after diagnosis with advanced disease. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab or merestinib in addition to first-line cisplatin-gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

We did a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study at 81 hospitals across 18 countries. We enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed, non-resectable, recurrent, or metastatic biliary tract adenocarcinoma, who were treatment-naive, aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, estimated life expectancy of 3 months or more, and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (2:1:2:1) to receive either intravenous ramucirumab 8 mg/kg or placebo (on days 1 and 8 in 21-day cycles) or oral merestinib 80 mg or placebo (once daily) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or patient or investigator request for discontinuation. All participants received intravenous cisplatin 25 mg/m and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m (on days 1 and 8 in 21-day cycles), for a maximum of eight cycles. Randomisation was done by an interactive web response system using a permuted block method (blocks of six) and was stratified by primary tumour site, geographical region, and presence of metastatic disease. Participants, investigators, and the study funder were masked to treatment assignment within the intravenous and oral groups. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (in the intention-to-treat population). The safety analysis was done in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02711553, and long-term follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between May 25, 2016, and Aug 8, 2017, 450 patients were assessed for eligibility and 309 (69%) were enrolled and randomly assigned to ramucirumab (n=106), merestinib (n=102), or pooled placebo (n=101); 306 received at least one dose of study treatment. The median follow-up time for progression-free survival at data cutoff (Feb 16, 2018) was 10·9 months (IQR 8·1-14·1). Median progression-free survival was 6·5 months (80% CI 5·7-7·1) in the ramucirumab group, 7·0 months (6·2-7·1) in the merestinib group, and 6·6 months (5·6-6·8) in the pooled placebo group (ramucirumab vs placebo hazard ratio 1·12 [80% CI 0·90-1·40], two-sided stratified p=0·48; merestinib vs placebo 0·92 [0·73-1·15], two-sided stratified p=0·64). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (51 [49%] of 104 patients in the ramucirumab group; 48 [47%] of 102 in the merestinib group; and 33 [33%] of 100 in the pooled placebo group), thrombocytopenia (36 [35%]; 19 [19%]; and 17 [17%]), and anaemia (28 [27%]; 16 [16%]; and 19 [19%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 53 (51%) patients in the ramucirumab group, 56 (55%) in the merestinib group, and 48 (48%) in the pooled placebo group. Treatment-related deaths (deemed related by the investigator) occurred in one (1%) of 104 patients in the ramucirumab group (cardiac arrest) and two (2%) of 102 patients in the merestinib group (pulmonary embolism [n=1] and sepsis [n=1]).

INTERPRETATION

Adding ramucirumab or merestinib to first-line cisplatin-gemcitabine was well tolerated, with no new safety signals, but neither improved progression-free survival in patients with molecularly unselected, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. The role of these targeted inhibitors remains investigational, highlighting the need for further understanding of biliary tract malignancies and the contribution of molecular selection.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

摘要

背景

胆道癌是一种侵袭性、罕见的胃肠道恶性肿瘤,预后较差;约有一半的此类癌症患者在确诊为晚期疾病后 1 年内存活。我们旨在评估雷莫芦单抗或默替尼联合一线顺铂-吉西他滨治疗局部晚期或转移性胆道癌患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们在 18 个国家的 81 家医院进行了一项随机、双盲、二期研究。我们招募了组织学或细胞学证实的、不可切除的、复发性或转移性胆道腺癌患者,这些患者未经治疗、年龄在 18 岁或以上、东部肿瘤协作组体力状态为 0 或 1、预期寿命在 3 个月以上、且根据实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1 测量有可测量的疾病。合格的参与者以 2:1:2:1 的比例随机分配接受静脉注射雷莫芦单抗 8mg/kg 或安慰剂(每 21 天周期的第 1 和第 8 天)或口服默替尼 80mg 或安慰剂(每天一次),直至疾病进展、无法耐受的毒性、死亡或患者或研究者要求停药。所有参与者均接受静脉注射顺铂 25mg/m2 和吉西他滨 1000mg/m2(每 21 天周期的第 1 和第 8 天),最多 8 个周期。随机化是通过交互式网络应答系统使用置换块方法(块大小为 6)进行的,按主要肿瘤部位、地理区域和转移性疾病的存在进行分层。参与者、研究者和研究资助者对静脉内和口服组的治疗分配保持盲态。主要终点是研究者评估的无进展生存期(在意向治疗人群中)。安全性分析是在接受至少一剂指定治疗的所有患者中进行的。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02711553,正在进行长期随访。

结果

2016 年 5 月 25 日至 2017 年 8 月 8 日,对 450 名患者进行了资格评估,其中 309 名(69%)符合入组条件并随机分配至雷莫芦单抗组(n=106)、默替尼组(n=102)或安慰剂混合组(n=101);306 名患者接受了至少一剂研究治疗。数据截止日期(2018 年 2 月 16 日)时无进展生存期的中位随访时间为 10.9 个月(IQR 8.1-14.1)。雷莫芦单抗组的中位无进展生存期为 6.5 个月(80%CI 5.7-7.1),默替尼组为 7.0 个月(6.2-7.1),安慰剂混合组为 6.6 个月(5.6-6.8)(雷莫芦单抗与安慰剂的风险比为 1.12[90%CI 0.90-1.40],双侧分层 p=0.48;默替尼与安慰剂为 0.92[0.73-1.15],双侧分层 p=0.64)。最常见的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件为中性粒细胞减少症(雷莫芦单抗组 104 例中有 51 例[49%];默替尼组 102 例中有 48 例[47%];安慰剂混合组 100 例中有 33 例[33%])、血小板减少症(雷莫芦单抗组 36 例[35%];默替尼组 19 例[19%];安慰剂混合组 17 例[17%])和贫血症(雷莫芦单抗组 28 例[27%];默替尼组 16 例[16%];安慰剂混合组 19 例[19%])。雷莫芦单抗组 53 例(51%)、默替尼组 56 例(55%)和安慰剂混合组 48 例(48%)发生严重不良事件。雷莫芦单抗组有 1 例(1%)(心脏骤停)和默替尼组有 2 例(2%)(肺栓塞[n=1]和脓毒症[n=1])的治疗相关死亡被研究者认为与治疗相关。

解释

在未经选择的分子局部晚期或转移性胆道癌患者中,联合使用雷莫芦单抗或默替尼联合一线顺铂-吉西他滨治疗是可以耐受的,没有新的安全性信号,但都没有改善无进展生存期。这些靶向抑制剂的作用仍在研究中,这突出表明需要进一步了解胆道恶性肿瘤以及分子选择的作用。

资金来源

礼来公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验