RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Clin Ther. 2021 Nov;43(11):1827-1842. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
Health care costs and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes were evaluated among US patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) or CV risk factors.
Patients with ≥24 months of continuous enrollment were selected from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases from January 1, 2014, to September 30, 2018. For the first qualifying 24-month period, months 1 to 12 defined the baseline period and months 13 to 24 defined the follow-up period. All patients had ≥2 T2D diagnoses during baseline. Two cohorts were created: (1) patients with ≥1 CVD diagnosis during baseline ("CVD cohort"); and (2) patients with ≥1 CV risk factor ("CV risk cohort") and no diagnosed CVD during baseline. The percentage of patients with subsequent CVD diagnoses and annual all-cause, T2D-related, and CV-related costs in baseline and follow-up periods were reported.
In total, 1,106,716 patients met inclusion criteria: CVD cohort, 224,018 patients; CV risk cohort, 812,144 patients; and no diagnosed CVD or CV risk factors, 70,554. During baseline, 40.2% of the CVD cohort had 2 or more CVD diagnoses. During follow-up, 10.5% of the CV risk cohort had evidence of CVD (ie, emergent CVD). During baseline, the CVD cohort had mean (SD) all-cause costs of $38,985 ($69,936); T2D-related costs, $16,208 ($34,104); and CV-related annual costs, $18,842 ($44,457). The CV risk cohort had mean all-cause costs of $13,207 ($27,057); T2D-related costs, $5226 ($12,268); and CV-related costs, $2754 ($10,586). During follow-up, the CV risk cohort with emergent CVD had higher mean all-cause, T2D-related, and CV-related annual costs than costs among patients without CVD (all-cause, $39,365 [$67,731] vs $13,401 [$27,530]; T2D related, $18,520 [$37,256] vs $5732 [$12,540]; and CV related, $18,893 [$43,584] vs $2650 [$10,501], respectively).
Costs for patients with T2D and either CVD or CV risk are substantial. In this analysis, ∼10% of patients with CV risk were diagnosed with emergent CVD. All-cause costs among patients with emergent CVD were nearly 3 times higher than those among patients with CV risk only. Because costs associated with CVD in the T2D population are high, preventing CVD events in patients with T2D has the potential to decrease overall health care costs and avoid additional disease burden for these patients.
评估美国患有 2 型糖尿病(T2D)和心血管疾病(CVD)或心血管风险因素的患者的医疗保健费用和心血管结局。
从 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 9 月 30 日,从 MarketScan 商业和医疗保险数据库中选择了具有≥24 个月连续参保的患者。在第一个符合条件的 24 个月期间,第 1 至 12 个月定义为基线期,第 13 至 24 个月定义为随访期。所有患者在基线期均有≥2 例 T2D 诊断。创建了两个队列:(1)基线期有≥1 例 CVD 诊断的患者(CVD 队列);(2)有≥1 例心血管风险因素但基线期无诊断性 CVD 的患者(CV 风险队列)。报告了基线期和随访期内随后发生 CVD 诊断以及全因、T2D 相关和心血管相关年度费用的患者比例。
共有 1106716 例患者符合纳入标准:CVD 队列 224018 例,CV 风险队列 812144 例,无诊断性 CVD 或心血管风险因素 70554 例。在基线期,40.2%的 CVD 队列有 2 个或更多的 CVD 诊断。在随访期间,10.5%的 CV 风险队列出现了 CVD 证据(即新发 CVD)。在基线期,CVD 队列的全因费用平均(SD)为 38985 美元(69936 美元);T2D 相关费用为 16208 美元(34104 美元);心血管相关年度费用为 18842 美元(44457 美元)。CV 风险队列的全因费用平均为 13207 美元(27057 美元);T2D 相关费用为 5226 美元(12268 美元);心血管相关费用为 2754 美元(10586 美元)。在随访期间,新发 CVD 的 CV 风险队列的全因、T2D 相关和心血管相关年度费用均高于无 CVD 的患者(全因费用分别为 39365 美元(67731 美元)比 13401 美元(27530 美元);T2D 相关费用分别为 18520 美元(37256 美元)比 5732 美元(12540 美元);心血管相关费用分别为 18893 美元(43584 美元)比 2650 美元(10501 美元))。
患有 T2D 且有 CVD 或心血管风险的患者的费用相当高。在这项分析中,约 10%的 CV 风险患者被诊断为新发 CVD。新发 CVD 患者的全因费用几乎是仅有 CV 风险患者的 3 倍。由于 T2D 人群中 CVD 相关费用较高,预防 T2D 患者的 CVD 事件有可能降低整体医疗保健费用,并避免这些患者的额外疾病负担。