Westmead Institute for Maternal & Fetal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Feb;62(1):12-21. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13460. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
There is a lack of evidence for pre-eclampsia prophylaxis with aspirin in women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM).
To examine the evidence for aspirin in pre-eclampsia prophylaxis in women with pre-existing DM.
An electronic search using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane CENTRAL register of controlled trials through to February 2021 was performed. Reference lists of identified studies, previous review articles, clinical practice guidelines and government reports were manually searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of aspirin vs placebo for pre-eclampsia prophylaxis were included. Articles were manually reviewed to determine if cohorts included women with DM. The systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Data from included trials were extracted independently by two authors who also independently assessed risk of bias as per the Cochrane Handbook criteria version 5.1.0. Data were analysed using Rev-Man 5.4.
Forty RCTs were identified, of which 11 included a confirmed subset of women with DM; however, data were insufficient for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of 930 women with DM, from individual patient data included in a systematic review and unpublished data from one of the 11 RCTs, showed a non-significant difference in the outcome of pre-eclampsia in participants treated with aspirin compared to placebo (odds ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.20-1.71; P = 0.33).
Pre-eclampsia risk reduction with aspirin prophylaxis in women with pre-existing DM may be similar to women without pre-existing DM. However, randomised data within this meta-analysis were insufficient, warranting the need for further studies within this high-risk group of women.
对于患有糖尿病(DM)的女性,阿司匹林预防子痫前期的证据不足。
探讨阿司匹林在预防患有糖尿病的女性子痫前期中的作用。
使用 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 对照试验注册库进行电子检索,检索时间截至 2021 年 2 月。手动检索已确定研究的参考文献列表、先前的综述文章、临床实践指南和政府报告。纳入阿司匹林与安慰剂预防子痫前期的随机对照试验(RCT)。手动审查文章以确定队列是否包括患有 DM 的女性。系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目进行。两名作者独立提取纳入试验的数据,他们还根据 Cochrane 手册 5.1.0 版的标准独立评估偏倚风险。使用 RevMan 5.4 进行数据分析。
确定了 40 项 RCT,其中 11 项研究包括了患有 DM 的女性的确诊亚组;然而,数据分析不足。对纳入的系统评价中的个体患者数据和 11 项 RCT 之一的未发表数据进行分析,纳入了 930 名患有 DM 的女性,结果显示,与安慰剂相比,阿司匹林治疗组子痫前期的结局无显著差异(比值比 0.58;95% CI 0.20-1.71;P=0.33)。
对于患有糖尿病的女性,阿司匹林预防子痫前期的风险降低可能与无糖尿病的女性相似。然而,本荟萃分析中的随机数据不足,需要在该高危女性群体中开展进一步的研究。