Suppr超能文献

直接从阳性血培养物进行 MALDI-TOF MS 快速鉴定:特别关注周转时间。

Direct Rapid Identification from Positive Blood Cultures by MALDI-TOF MS: Specific Focus on Turnaround Times.

机构信息

Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0110321. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01103-21. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

Abstract

Early availability of pathogen identification in bloodstream infections has critical importance in patients' management. This study investigated the accuracy and feasibility of the direct rapid identification (RID) method from positive blood cultures (BCs) by MALDI-TOF MS and its impact on the turnaround time (TAT) compared to the short-term incubation routine identification (SIRID) method. Pellets prepared from 328 BCs using a serum separator tube in the RID method and colonies on agar plates in the SIRID method were identified with MALDI Biotyper. BCs on weekdays from 6 a.m. to 4 p.m. were defined as the daytime signal group (DSG); BCs from 4 p.m. to 6 a.m. were defined as the night signal group (NSG). Comparison between the two methods was performed with 310 monomicrobial BCs. Two hundred ninety-five (95.2%) monomicrobial BCs yielded an identification result with the RID method. Of the 295 BCs, 289 (97.9%) were identified correctly at the species level, 4 (1.4%) were at the genus level, and 2 (0.7%) were misidentified. In the RID method, at score cutoff values of 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5, the rates of correct identifications at the species level were 97.9%, 98.9%, 99.3%, and 100%, respectively. The mean TAT in the DSG was significantly lower ( < 0.001) in the RID method (mean: 2.86 h; 95% CI: 2.65 to 3.07) compared to the SIRID method (mean: 19.49 h; 95% CI: 18.08 to 20.89). Correct identification rates at the species level were 100% in Gram-negative bacteria, 88.9% in Gram-positive bacteria, and 93.2% of all BCs isolates with the RID method. The TAT was improved remarkably in DSG, which might contribute to empirical antibiotic therapies of patients. Using MALDI-TOF MS directly from BCs reduces the time required for pathogen identification, and the TATs for final identification have been compared with overnight incubation from solid media in previous studies. However, identification from a short incubation of agar plates has been increasingly accepted and successfully implemented in routine laboratories, but there is no data comparing direct MALDI-TOF MS with the short-term incubated agar plates. Our study showed that the TAT improved remarkably by applying a RID method by MALDI-TOF MS twice a day periodically when compared to the SIRID method.

摘要

血流感染中病原体的早期鉴定具有重要的临床意义。本研究旨在评估基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)直接快速鉴定(RID)法从阳性血培养(BC)中鉴定的准确性和可行性,并与短期孵育常规鉴定(SIRID)法比较,评估其对 turnaround time(TAT)的影响。RID 法采用血清分离管制备 BC 沉淀,SIRID 法则采用琼脂平板上的菌落,两者均采用 MALDI Biotyper 进行鉴定。将上午 6 点至下午 4 点之间的 BC 定义为日间信号组(DSG);下午 4 点至上午 6 点的 BC 定义为夜间信号组(NSG)。以 310 份单一微生物 BC 对两种方法进行比较。RID 法对 295 份单一微生物 BC 进行了鉴定。在 295 份 BC 中,RID 法的鉴定结果为 289 份(97.9%)准确到种,4 份(1.4%)准确到属,2 份(0.7%)鉴定错误。RID 法在鉴定分值 cutoff 值分别为 1.2、1.3、1.4 和 1.5 时,正确鉴定到种的比例分别为 97.9%、98.9%、99.3%和 100%。DSG 中 RID 法的平均 TAT 显著低于 SIRID 法(RID 法平均:2.86 小时;95%CI:2.65 至 3.07;SIRID 法平均:19.49 小时;95%CI:18.08 至 20.89)( < 0.001)。RID 法鉴定到种的正确率为革兰氏阴性菌 100%、革兰氏阳性菌 88.9%和所有 BC 分离株 93.2%。RID 法能显著提高 DSG 的 TAT,可能有助于患者的经验性抗生素治疗。利用 MALDI-TOF MS 直接从 BC 中进行鉴定,缩短了病原体鉴定所需的时间,与以往研究中固体培养基孵育过夜相比,本研究比较了最终鉴定的 TAT。然而,琼脂平板短期孵育的方法已被广泛接受,并在常规实验室中成功实施,但尚无数据比较直接 MALDI-TOF MS 与短期孵育的琼脂平板。本研究显示,与 SIRID 法相比,应用 MALDI-TOF MS 进行 RID 法检测,每天两次定期检测,可显著缩短 TAT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01e4/8672911/7d832bca4b84/spectrum.01103-21-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验