Suppr超能文献

1p/19q 缺失检测在少突胶质细胞瘤诊断中的准确性:一项基于 Cochrane 系统评价的综合荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of 1p/19q codeletion tests in oligodendroglioma: A comprehensive meta-analysis based on a Cochrane systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Neuropathology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Instituite of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2022 Jun;48(4):e12790. doi: 10.1111/nan.12790. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

Abstract

Codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q, in conjunction with a mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 gene, is the molecular diagnostic criterion for oligodendroglioma, IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted. 1p/19q codeletion is a diagnostic marker and allows prognostication and prediction of the best drug response within IDH-mutant tumours. We performed a Cochrane review and simple economic analysis to establish the most sensitive, specific and cost-effective techniques for determining 1p/19q codeletion status. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) test methods were considered as reference standard. Most techniques (FISH, chromogenic in situ hybridisation [CISH], PCR, real-time PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification [MLPA], single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] array, comparative genomic hybridisation [CGH], array CGH, next-generation sequencing [NGS], mass spectrometry and NanoString) showed good sensitivity (few false negatives) for detection of 1p/19q codeletions in glioma, irrespective of whether FISH or PCR-based LOH was used as the reference standard. Both NGS and SNP array had a high specificity (fewer false positives) for 1p/19q codeletion when considered against FISH as the reference standard. Our findings suggest that G banding is not a suitable test for 1p/19q analysis. Within these limits, considering cost per diagnosis and using FISH as a reference, MLPA was marginally more cost-effective than other tests, although these economic analyses were limited by the range of available parameters, time horizon and data from multiple healthcare organisations.

摘要

1p 和 19q 染色体臂的缺失,以及异柠檬酸脱氢酶 1 或 2 基因突变,是少突胶质细胞瘤、IDH 突变和 1p/19q 缺失的分子诊断标准。1p/19q 缺失是一个诊断标志物,可预测 IDH 突变肿瘤的最佳药物反应和预后。我们进行了一项 Cochrane 综述和简单的经济分析,以确定最敏感、最特异和最具成本效益的技术来确定 1p/19q 缺失状态。荧光原位杂交(FISH)和聚合酶链反应(PCR)-基于杂合性丢失(LOH)测试方法被认为是参考标准。大多数技术(FISH、显色原位杂交[CISH]、PCR、实时 PCR、多重连接依赖性探针扩增[MLPA]、单核苷酸多态性[SNP]阵列、比较基因组杂交[CGH]、阵列 CGH、下一代测序[NGS]、质谱和 NanoString)显示出良好的敏感性(假阴性较少),可检测胶质瘤中的 1p/19q 缺失,无论是否使用 FISH 或 PCR-基于 LOH 作为参考标准。在考虑将 FISH 作为参考标准时,NGS 和 SNP 阵列对 1p/19q 缺失具有较高的特异性(假阳性较少)。我们的研究结果表明,G 带分析不适合用于 1p/19q 分析。在这些限制范围内,考虑到每个诊断的成本,并使用 FISH 作为参考,MLPA 比其他测试略具成本效益,尽管这些经济分析受到可用参数范围、时间范围和来自多个医疗机构的数据的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bfd/9208578/e8f989b3c462/NAN-48-e12790-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验