Kavipriya D, Prakash Suman Susan, Dhandapani Sarumathi, Rajshekar Deepashree, Sastry Apurba Sankar
Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
J Lab Physicians. 2021 Jul 9;13(4):374-379. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1732489. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Timely initiation of antimicrobial therapy in patients with blood stream infection is absolutely necessary to reduce mortality and morbidity. Most clinical microbiology laboratories use conventional methods for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) that involve biochemical methods for identification followed by AST by disk diffusion. The aim of the current study is to assess the various errors associated with direct susceptibility testing done from blood culture broth using automated AST system-Vitek-2 compact compared with the reference method of AST done from bacterial colonies. The study was conducted in a tertiary care public sector 2,200-bedded hospital in South India for a period of 6 months. The study involved positively flagged blood culture bottles that yielded single morphotype of Gram-negative organism by Gram stain. A total of 120 bacterial isolates were collected that consisted of consecutively obtained first 60 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae family (30 and 30 ) and consecutively obtained first 60 nonfermenters (30 and 30 Vitek-2 AST was done from these 120 blood culture broth, following the protocol by Biomerieux, and results were obtained. Then, Vitek-2 was done from colonies (reference method) using appropriate panel for Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenters, and results were obtained. Both the results were compared. Nonfermenters showed a better categorical agreement of 97.6%, as compared to Enterobacteriaceae, which showed 97%. Among Enterobacteriaceae, both and showed categorical agreement of 97% each. The procedure of AST directly from blood culture broth represents a simple and effective technique that can reduce the turnaround time by 24 hours, which in turn benefits the clinician in appropriate utilization of antimicrobials for better patient care.
对于血流感染患者,及时启动抗菌治疗对于降低死亡率和发病率绝对必要。大多数临床微生物实验室使用传统方法进行鉴定和抗菌药物敏感性测试(AST),这些方法包括用于鉴定的生化方法,随后通过纸片扩散法进行AST。本研究的目的是评估与使用自动化AST系统Vitek-2 compact从血培养肉汤中进行直接药敏试验相关的各种误差,并与从细菌菌落进行AST的参考方法进行比较。该研究在印度南部一家拥有2200张床位的三级护理公共部门医院进行,为期6个月。该研究涉及革兰氏染色显示产生单一形态型革兰氏阴性菌的阳性标记血培养瓶。总共收集了120株细菌分离株,包括连续获得的肠杆菌科的前60株分离株(各30株)和连续获得的前60株非发酵菌(各30株)。按照生物梅里埃公司的方案,对这120份血培养肉汤进行Vitek-2 AST,并获得结果。然后,使用适用于肠杆菌科和非发酵菌的鉴定板从菌落进行Vitek-2 AST(参考方法),并获得结果。对两种结果进行比较。与肠杆菌科的97%相比,非发酵菌显示出更好的类别一致性,为97.6%。在肠杆菌科中, 和 均显示类别一致性为97%。直接从血培养肉汤中进行AST的程序是一种简单有效的技术,可将周转时间缩短24小时,这反过来有利于临床医生合理使用抗菌药物,以更好地护理患者。