Suppr超能文献

BCS 分类 I 和 III 生物豁免辅料风险评估。

Evaluation of Excipient Risk in BCS Class I and III Biowaivers.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

AAPS J. 2022 Jan 5;24(1):20. doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00670-1.

Abstract

The objective of this review article is to summarize literature data pertinent to potential excipient effects on intestinal drug permeability and transit. Despite the use of excipients in drug products for decades, considerable research efforts have been directed towards evaluating their potential effects on drug bioavailability. Potential excipient concerns stem from drug formulation changes (e.g., scale-up and post-approval changes, development of a new generic product). Regulatory agencies have established in vivo bioequivalence standards and, as a result, may waive the in vivo requirement, known as a biowaiver, for some oral products. Biowaiver acceptance criteria are based on the in vitro characterization of the drug substance and drug product using the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). Various regulatory guidance documents have been issued regarding BCS-based biowaivers, such that the current FDA guidance is more restrictive than prior guidance, specifically about excipient risk. In particular, sugar alcohols have been identified as potential absorption-modifying excipients. These biowaivers and excipient risks are discussed here. Graphical Abstract.

摘要

本文旨在总结文献数据,探讨辅料对肠道药物渗透和转运的潜在影响。尽管辅料在药物产品中的应用已有数十年,但人们仍投入大量研究努力来评估它们对药物生物利用度的潜在影响。辅料的潜在问题源于药物制剂的变化(例如,放大和批准后变更、新仿制药产品的开发)。监管机构制定了体内生物等效性标准,因此可能会免除某些口服产品的体内要求,即所谓的生物豁免。生物豁免接受标准基于使用生物药剂学分类系统 (BCS) 对药物物质和药物产品的体外特征进行描述。已经发布了各种关于基于 BCS 的生物豁免的监管指导文件,因此当前的 FDA 指南比之前的指南更严格,特别是关于辅料风险。具体而言,糖醇已被确定为潜在的吸收改性辅料。本文讨论了这些生物豁免和辅料风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f31/8817461/fa945ab6701c/12248_2021_670_Figa_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验