UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
François-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health & Human Rights, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Feb;62(2):157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.07.018.
Although growing evidence links residential evictions to health, little work has examined connections between eviction and healthcare utilization or access. In this study, eviction records are linked to Medicaid claims to estimate short-term associations between eviction and healthcare utilization, as well as Medicaid disenrollment.
New York City eviction records from 2017 were linked to New York State Medicaid claims, with 1,300 evicted patients matched to 261,855 non-evicted patients with similar past healthcare utilization, demographics, and neighborhoods. Outcomes included patients' number of acute and ambulatory care visits, healthcare spending, Medicaid disenrollment, and pharmaceutical prescription fills during 6 months of follow-up. Coarsened exact matching was used to strengthen causal inference in observational data. Weighted generalized linear models were then fit, including censoring weights. Analyses were conducted in 2019-2021.
Eviction was associated with 63% higher odds of losing Medicaid coverage (95% CI=1.38, 1.92, p<0.001), fewer pharmaceutical prescription fills (incidence rate ratio=0.68, 95% CI=0.52, 0.88, p=0.004), and lower odds of generating any healthcare spending (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.61, 0.85, p<0.001). However, among patients who generated any spending, average spending was 20% higher for those evicted (95% CI=1.03, 1.40, p=0.017), such that evicted patients generated more spending on balance. Marginally significant estimates suggested associations with increased acute, and decreased ambulatory, care visits.
Results suggest that eviction drives increased healthcare spending while disrupting healthcare access. Given previous research that Medicaid expansion lowered eviction rates, eviction and Medicaid disenrollment may operate cyclically, accumulating disadvantage. Preventing evictions may improve access to care and lower Medicaid costs.
尽管越来越多的证据表明住宅驱逐与健康有关,但很少有研究探讨驱逐与医疗保健利用或获取之间的联系。在这项研究中,将驱逐记录与医疗补助索赔联系起来,以估计驱逐与医疗保健利用以及医疗补助退出之间的短期关联。
从 2017 年纽约市的驱逐记录中提取数据,并与纽约州医疗补助索赔相联系,其中 1300 名被驱逐的患者与 261855 名过去医疗保健利用、人口统计学和社区情况相似的非被驱逐患者相匹配。结果包括患者在 6 个月的随访期间急性和门诊护理就诊次数、医疗保健支出、医疗补助退出以及药品处方配药情况。使用粗化精确匹配来加强观察数据中的因果推断。然后拟合加权广义线性模型,包括截尾权重。分析于 2019 年至 2021 年进行。
与失去医疗补助覆盖相关的可能性高出 63%(95%置信区间=1.38,1.92,p<0.001),配药次数减少(发病率比=0.68,95%置信区间=0.52,0.88,p=0.004),产生任何医疗保健支出的可能性降低(OR=0.72,95%置信区间=0.61,0.85,p<0.001)。然而,在产生任何支出的患者中,被驱逐的患者的平均支出高出 20%(95%置信区间=1.03,1.40,p=0.017),因此被驱逐的患者在平衡方面产生了更多的支出。边际显著的估计表明与急性护理就诊次数增加和门诊护理就诊次数减少有关。
结果表明,驱逐导致医疗保健支出增加,同时破坏了医疗保健获取。鉴于先前的研究表明医疗补助扩大降低了驱逐率,驱逐和医疗补助退出可能会循环出现,从而积累劣势。防止驱逐可能会改善获得护理的机会并降低医疗补助成本。