Suppr超能文献

伦理与抗生素耐药性。

Ethics and antibiotic resistance.

机构信息

The Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford. Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.

Monash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, 3800, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Br Med Bull. 2022 Mar 21;141(1):4-14. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldab030.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION OR BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance raises ethical issues due to the severe and inequitably distributed consequences caused by individual actions and policies.

SOURCES OF DATA

Synthesis of ethical, scientific and clinical literature.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Ethical analyses have focused on the moral responsibilities of patients to complete antibiotic courses, resistance as a tragedy of the commons and attempts to limit use through antibiotic stewardship.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Each of these analyses has significant limitations and can result in self-defeating or overly narrow implications for policy.

GROWING POINTS

More complex analyses focus on ethical implications of ubiquitous asymptomatic carriage of resistant bacteria, non-linear outcomes within and between patients over time and global variation in resistant disease burdens.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Neglected topics include the harms of antibiotic use, including off-target effects on the human microbiome, and the lack of evidence guiding most antibiotic prescription decisions.

摘要

引言或背景

由于个体行为和政策导致的严重且不公平的后果,抗生素耐药性引发了伦理问题。

数据来源

对伦理、科学和临床文献的综合分析。

共识领域

伦理分析侧重于患者完成抗生素疗程的道德责任、将耐药性视为公共资源的悲剧以及通过抗生素管理来限制使用的尝试。

争议领域

这些分析中的每一种都有很大的局限性,并且可能导致政策自相矛盾或过于狭隘。

发展点

更复杂的分析侧重于普遍存在的无症状携带耐药菌的伦理含义、患者个体随时间的非线性结果以及全球耐药疾病负担的差异。

亟待研究的领域

被忽视的话题包括抗生素使用的危害,包括对人类微生物组的非靶向影响,以及缺乏指导大多数抗生素处方决策的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca97/8935610/8005f1a69f5c/ldab030f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验