Suppr超能文献

脑侵犯标准对 WHO 分级 1、2 和 3 级脑膜瘤发病率和分布的影响。

The impact of brain invasion criteria on the incidence and distribution of WHO grade 1, 2, and 3 meningiomas.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Division of Neuropathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Neuro Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;24(9):1524-1532. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac032.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2016 brain invasion was added as a standalone diagnostic criterion for Grade 2 meningiomas in the WHO Classification of Brain Tumors. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and distribution of meningiomas, and agreement, between the 2007 and 2016 WHO criteria.

METHODS

All cases of intracranial meningiomas diagnosed between 2007 and 2020 at a tertiary care academic hospital were identified. The incidence of each meningioma grade in the WHO 2007 and WHO 2016 cohorts were compared. Additionally, each case in the 2007 cohort was re-graded according to the WHO 2016 criteria to determine the intra-class correlation (ICC) between criteria.

RESULTS

Of 814 cases, 532 (65.4%) were in the 2007 WHO cohort and 282 (34.6%) were in the 2016 WHO cohort. There were no differences in the distribution of meningioma grades between cohorts (P = .11). Incidence rates were: 75.0% vs. 75.2% for Grade 1, 22.7% vs. 24.5% for Grade 2, and 2.3% vs. 0.4% for Grade 3, for the 2007 and 2016 cohorts, respectively. Upon re-grading, 21 cases (3.9%) were changed. ICC between original and revised grade was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91-0.93). Amongst Grade 2 meningiomas with brain invasion, 75.8% had three or more atypical histologic features or an elevated mitotic index.

CONCLUSIONS

Including brain invasion as a standalone diagnostic criterion for Grade 2 meningiomas had minimal impact on the incidence of specific meningioma grade tumors. There is strong agreement between the 2007 and 2016 WHO criteria, likely due to cosegregation of grade elevating features.

摘要

背景

2016 年,脑侵犯被添加为世界卫生组织(WHO)脑肿瘤分类中 2 级脑膜瘤的独立诊断标准。本研究旨在比较 2007 年和 2016 年 WHO 标准下脑膜瘤的发病率和分布以及一致性。

方法

在一家三级保健学术医院,确定了 2007 年至 2020 年间诊断的所有颅内脑膜瘤病例。比较了 2007 年和 2016 年 WHO 队列中每个脑膜瘤等级的发病率。此外,根据 2016 年 WHO 标准重新对 2007 年队列中的每个病例进行分级,以确定标准之间的组内相关系数(ICC)。

结果

在 814 例病例中,532 例(65.4%)为 2007 年 WHO 队列,282 例(34.6%)为 2016 年 WHO 队列。两组脑膜瘤分级分布无差异(P =.11)。发病率分别为:2007 年和 2016 年队列中,1 级为 75.0% vs. 75.2%,2 级为 22.7% vs. 24.5%,3 级为 2.3% vs. 0.4%。重新分级后,有 21 例(3.9%)发生变化。原始和修订等级之间的 ICC 为 0.92(95%CI:0.91-0.93)。在有脑侵犯的 2 级脑膜瘤中,75.8%有 3 个或更多非典型组织学特征或有丝分裂指数升高。

结论

将脑侵犯作为 2 级脑膜瘤的独立诊断标准对特定脑膜瘤等级肿瘤的发病率影响不大。2007 年和 2016 年 WHO 标准之间具有很强的一致性,这可能是由于分级升高特征的共分离。

相似文献

3
WHO grade of intracranial meningiomas differs with respect to patient's age, location, tumor size and peritumoral edema.
J Neurooncol. 2019 Nov;145(2):277-286. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03293-x. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
5
Necrosis is a consistent factor to recurrence of meningiomas: should it be a stand-alone grading criterion for grade II meningioma?
J Neurooncol. 2018 Apr;137(2):331-336. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2721-4. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
6
The accuracy of meningioma grading: a 10-year retrospective audit.
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;31(2):141-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00621.x.
8
WHO classification of meningiomas-A single institutional experience.
Neurochirurgie. 2021 Apr;67(2):119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
9
Meningioma sampling: how much is enough for the accurate grading of atypical meningiomas?
Pathology. 2021 Aug;53(5):602-607. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2020.10.024. Epub 2021 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical outcomes of trigonal intraventricular meningiomas: a single-centre study.
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jul 5;47(1):304. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02542-6.
5
Molecular prognostication in grade 3 meningiomas and p16/MTAP immunohistochemistry for predicting status.
Neurooncol Adv. 2024 Jan 8;6(1):vdae002. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae002. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Hemorrhagic meningioma with pulmonary metastasis: Case report and literature review.
Open Life Sci. 2023 Oct 23;18(1):20220745. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0745. eCollection 2023.
7
Location pattern of recurrence of fully resected grade 1 meningiomas.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Oct;165(10):2865-2871. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05758-5. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The definition and role of brain invasion in meningioma grading: Still controversial after all these years.
Free Neuropathol. 2021 Mar 24;2:8. doi: 10.17879/freeneuropathology-2021-3276. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
A clinically applicable integrative molecular classification of meningiomas.
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7874):119-125. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03850-3. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
Incidence of Benign Meningiomas in the United States: Current and Future Trends.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Apr 8;5(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab035. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106.
5
A Practical Overview on the Molecular Biology of Meningioma.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 Nov 2;20(12):62. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01084-w.
6
Sex differences in cancer mechanisms.
Biol Sex Differ. 2020 Apr 15;11(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13293-020-00291-x.
7
Molecular and translational advances in meningiomas.
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Jan 14;21(Suppl 1):i4-i17. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy178.
8
Current treatment options for meningioma.
Expert Rev Neurother. 2018 Mar;18(3):241-249. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1429920. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
10
Diagnostic challenges in meningioma.
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Nov 29;19(12):1588-1598. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox101.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验