Focosi Daniele, Maggi Fabrizio, Casadevall Arturo
North-Western Tuscany Blood Bank, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Viruses. 2022 Jan 19;14(2):187. doi: 10.3390/v14020187.
Sterilizing immunity after vaccination is desirable to prevent the spread of infection from vaccinees, which can be especially dangerous in hospital settings while managing frail patients. Sterilizing immunity requires neutralizing antibodies at the site of infection, which for respiratory viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 implies the occurrence of neutralizing IgA in mucosal secretions. Systemic vaccination by intramuscular delivery induces no or low-titer neutralizing IgA against vaccine antigens. Mucosal priming or boosting, is needed to provide sterilizing immunity. On the other side of the coin, sterilizing immunity, by zeroing interhuman transmission, could confine SARS-CoV-2 in animal reservoirs, preventing spontaneous attenuation of virulence in humans as presumably happened with the endemic coronaviruses. We review here the pros and cons of each vaccination strategy, the current mucosal SARS-CoV-2 vaccines under development, and their implications for public health.
接种疫苗后实现无菌免疫对于防止接种者传播感染是可取的,这在医院环境中治疗体弱患者时可能特别危险。无菌免疫需要在感染部位产生中和抗体,对于像严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)这样的呼吸道病毒来说,这意味着在粘膜分泌物中出现中和性免疫球蛋白A(IgA)。通过肌肉注射进行全身接种不会诱导产生针对疫苗抗原的中和性IgA,或者只能诱导产生低滴度的中和性IgA。需要进行粘膜启动或加强免疫来提供无菌免疫。另一方面,通过消除人际传播实现无菌免疫可能会将SARS-CoV-2限制在动物宿主中,防止其在人类中像地方性冠状病毒那样自然减毒。我们在此回顾每种疫苗接种策略的利弊、目前正在研发的粘膜SARS-CoV-2疫苗及其对公共卫生的影响。