Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG/Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 9;17(3):e0264311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264311. eCollection 2022.
The Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2pandemic necessitated several changes in maternity care. We investigated maternity care providers' opinions on the positive and negative effects of these changes and on potential areas of improvement for future maternity care both in times of crisis and in regular maternity care.
We conducted nineteen semi-structured in-depth interviews with obstetricians, obstetric residents, community-based and hospital-based midwives and obstetric nurses. The interviews were thematically analysed using inductive Thematic analysis.
Five themes were generated: '(Dis)proportionate measures', 'A significant impact of COVID-19', 'Differing views on inter-provider cooperation', 'Reluctance to seek help' and 'Lessons learnt'. The Central Organizing Concept was: 'It was tough but necessary'. The majority of participants were positive about most of the measures that were taken and about their proportionality. These measures had a significant impact on maternity care providers, both mentally and on an organizational level. Most hospital-based care providers were positive about professional cooperation and communication, but some community-based midwives indicated that the cooperation between different midwifery care practices was suboptimal. Negative effects mentioned were a higher threshold for women to seek care, less partner involvement and perceived more fear among women and their partners, especially around birth. The most significant positive effect mentioned was increased use of eHealth tools. Recommendations for future care were to consider the necessity of prenatal and postnatal care more critically, to replace some face-to-face visits with eHealth and to provide more individualised care.
Maternity care providers experienced measures and organizational changes during the first wave of the COVID19-pandemic as tough, but necessary. They believed that a more critical consideration of medically necessary care, increased use of e-health and more individualised care might contribute to making maternity care more sustainable during and after the pandemic.
冠状病毒 SARS-CoV-2 大流行促使产时护理发生了多项改变。我们调查了产时护理提供者对这些改变的积极和消极影响的看法,以及在危机时期和常规产时护理中未来产时护理的潜在改进领域。
我们对产科医生、妇产科住院医师、社区和医院助产士以及产科护士进行了 19 次半结构化深入访谈。使用归纳主题分析对访谈进行了主题分析。
产生了五个主题:“(不成比例的)措施”、“COVID-19 的重大影响”、“对提供者间合作的不同看法”、“不愿寻求帮助”和“吸取的教训”。中心组织概念是:“这很艰难,但有必要”。大多数参与者对大多数采取的措施及其相称性持积极态度。这些措施对产时护理提供者在心理和组织层面上都产生了重大影响。大多数医院护理提供者对专业合作和沟通持积极态度,但一些社区助产士表示,不同助产实践之间的合作不尽如人意。提到的负面影响是妇女寻求护理的门槛更高、伴侣参与度更低以及妇女及其伴侣感到更多的恐惧,尤其是在分娩期间。提到的最大积极影响是更多地使用电子健康工具。对未来护理的建议是更批判性地考虑产前和产后护理的必要性,用电子健康代替一些面对面的访问,并提供更多个性化的护理。
在 COVID19 大流行的第一波期间,产时护理提供者认为措施和组织变革是艰难的,但也是必要的。他们认为,更批判性地考虑医学上必要的护理、增加电子健康的使用以及提供更多个性化的护理,可能有助于在大流行期间和之后使产时护理更具可持续性。