Suppr超能文献

电子健康记录系统中的工作绕过行为以及修订后的社会技术电子健康记录工作绕过分析框架:范围综述。

Workarounds in Electronic Health Record Systems and the Revised Sociotechnical Electronic Health Record Workaround Analysis Framework: Scoping Review.

机构信息

Center for Marketing & Supply Chain Management, Nyenrode Business Universiteit, Breukelen, Netherlands.

Center for Human Factors Engineering of Health Information Technology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 15;24(3):e33046. doi: 10.2196/33046.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic health record (EHR) system users devise workarounds to cope with mismatches between workflows designed in the EHR and preferred workflows in practice. Although workarounds appear beneficial at first sight, they frequently jeopardize patient safety, the quality of care, and the efficiency of care.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to aid in identifying, analyzing, and resolving EHR workarounds; the Sociotechnical EHR Workaround Analysis (SEWA) framework was published in 2019. Although the framework was based on a large case study, the framework still required theoretical validation, refinement, and enrichment.

METHODS

A scoping literature review was performed on studies related to EHR workarounds published between 2010 and 2021 in the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, or IEEE databases. A total of 737 studies were retrieved, of which 62 (8.4%) were included in the final analysis. Using an analytic framework, the included studies were investigated to uncover the rationales that EHR users have for workarounds, attributes characterizing workarounds, possible scopes, and types of perceived impacts of workarounds.

RESULTS

The SEWA framework was theoretically validated and extended based on the scoping review. Extensive support for the pre-existing rationales, attributes, possible scopes, and types of impact was found in the included studies. Moreover, 7 new rationales, 4 new attributes, and 3 new types of impact were incorporated. Similarly, the descriptions of multiple pre-existing rationales for workarounds were refined to describe each rationale more accurately.

CONCLUSIONS

SEWA is now grounded in the existing body of peer-reviewed empirical evidence on EHR workarounds and, as such, provides a theoretically validated and more complete synthesis of EHR workaround rationales, attributes, possible scopes, and types of impact. The revised SEWA framework can aid researchers and practitioners in a wider range of health care settings to identify, analyze, and resolve workarounds. This will improve user-centered EHR design and redesign, ultimately leading to improved patient safety, quality of care, and efficiency of care.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录 (EHR) 系统用户设计了工作流程,以应对 EHR 中设计的工作流程与实践中首选工作流程之间的不匹配。虽然工作流程在最初看起来很有帮助,但它们经常危及患者安全、护理质量和护理效率。

目的

本综述旨在帮助识别、分析和解决 EHR 工作流程;2019 年发布了社会技术电子健康记录工作流程分析 (SEWA) 框架。尽管该框架是基于一项大型案例研究,但该框架仍需要进行理论验证、改进和丰富。

方法

对 2010 年至 2021 年期间在 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane 或 IEEE 数据库中发表的与 EHR 工作流程相关的研究进行了范围广泛的文献综述。共检索到 737 项研究,其中 62 项(8.4%)被纳入最终分析。使用分析框架,对纳入的研究进行了调查,以揭示 EHR 用户进行工作流程的理由、工作流程的特征、可能的范围以及工作流程影响的类型。

结果

基于范围综述,对 SEWA 框架进行了理论验证和扩展。在纳入的研究中,广泛支持了预先存在的理由、属性、可能的范围和类型的影响。此外,还纳入了 7 个新的理由、4 个新的属性和 3 种新的影响类型。同样,对多个预先存在的工作流程理由的描述进行了细化,以更准确地描述每个理由。

结论

SEWA 现在基于 EHR 工作流程的现有同行评议实证证据,因此提供了一个经过理论验证和更完整的 EHR 工作流程理由、属性、可能的范围和影响类型的综合。经过修订的 SEWA 框架可以帮助研究人员和从业人员在更广泛的医疗保健环境中识别、分析和解决工作流程。这将改善以用户为中心的 EHR 设计和重新设计,最终提高患者安全、护理质量和护理效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f070/8965666/e68a520918af/jmir_v24i3e33046_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验