Department of Bio-Convergence Science, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekjedae-ro, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, 54896, Republic of Korea.
School of Environmental Science, Engineering, and Policy, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
Chemosphere. 2022 Jul;299:134388. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134388. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
Micro/nanoplastics - a useful but threatening material - continuously require fundamental research on its behaviors and properties for aggregation. Zeta potential (ζ) has been using as an indicator to determine the optimal aggregation for particle removal in water treatment processes. In the field work, however, an alternative method for streamlining these tasks and reducing the variability in processing efficiency is necessary. To improve practical utility in the field work, this study aimed at investigating applicability of the zero-point charge (ZPC) of the isoelectric point (IEP; ψ) as an alternative indicator for aggregation in place of ζ. For the purpose, this study conducted laboratory experiments and model simulations. The experiments measured ψ of microplastics in a trivalent-electrolyte aqueous solution using various concentrations of polyaluminum chloride (PAC) for reproducing the behavior of microplastics in natural water environments. As a result, ψ for polyethylene (PE) and polyvinylchloride (PVC) were found to be pH 6.59 and 6.43, respectively. The removal rates (r) depended on the aggregation at the initial pH and optimal PAC concentration. The experimental attachment efficiency (α), 0.14 to 0.4, showed a good correlation of over 95% with r, 0.04 to 0.84, both based on the pH change and PAC concentration and differing slightly with the type and size of the plastic. The highest α was achieved with the highest r when ψ was close to zero in the pH range of 6-8 using the optimized PAC concentration. Based on the experimental results, the model confirmed the applicability of ψ instead of ζ as an indicator of the aggregation by simulating α based on ψ and ionic strength, which are themselves based on the change in pH. Therefore, this study provides some insights into behaviors of microplastics by using the isoelectric point (IEP, ψpI) as an indicator of aggregation of microplastics in place of ζ. The IEP method is limited by initial pH, optimal dosage of coagulant, and type and size of microplastics, but it will increase practical utility in the field.
微/纳米塑料 - 一种有用但具有威胁性的材料 - 不断需要对其行为和特性进行基础研究,以促进聚集。Zeta 电位 (ζ) 一直被用作确定在水处理过程中去除颗粒的最佳聚集的指标。然而,在现场工作中,需要一种替代方法来简化这些任务并降低处理效率的可变性。为了提高现场工作的实际效用,本研究旨在研究等电点 (IEP; ψ) 的零点电荷 (ZPC) 作为替代 ζ 的聚集指标的适用性。为此,本研究进行了实验室实验和模型模拟。实验使用各种浓度的聚合氯化铝 (PAC) 测量了三价电解质水溶液中微塑料的 ψ,以再现微塑料在自然水环境中的行为。结果发现,聚乙烯 (PE) 和聚氯乙烯 (PVC) 的 ψ 分别为 6.59 和 6.43。去除率 (r) 取决于初始 pH 和最佳 PAC 浓度下的聚集。实验附着效率 (α),0.14 到 0.4,与 r 表现出很好的相关性,0.04 到 0.84,均基于 pH 值变化和 PAC 浓度,与塑料的类型和大小略有不同。当 ψ 在 6-8 pH 范围内接近零时,使用优化的 PAC 浓度可实现最高的 r 和 α。基于实验结果,该模型通过基于 ψ 和离子强度模拟 α 来确认 ψ 代替 ζ 作为聚集指标的适用性,而 ψ 和离子强度本身是基于 pH 值变化。因此,本研究通过使用等电点 (IEP,ψpI) 作为微塑料聚集的指标,为微塑料的行为提供了一些见解,代替了 ζ。IEP 方法受到初始 pH、最佳混凝剂剂量以及微塑料的类型和大小的限制,但它将增加现场工作的实际效用。