Suppr超能文献

一种用于高维中介假设的多重检验程序。

A multiple-testing procedure for high-dimensional mediation hypotheses.

作者信息

Dai James Y, Stanford Janet L, LeBlanc Michael

机构信息

Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109.

出版信息

J Am Stat Assoc. 2022;117(537):198-213. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1765785. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

Abstract

Mediation analysis is of rising interest in epidemiology and clinical trials. Among existing methods, the joint significance (JS) test yields an overly conservative type I error rate and low power, particularly for high-dimensional mediation hypotheses. In this article we develop a multiple-testing procedure that accurately controls the family-wise error rate (FWER) and the false discovery rate (FDR) when testing high-dimensional mediation hypotheses. The core of our procedure is based on estimating the proportions of component null hypotheses and the underlying mixture null distribution of p-values. Theoretical developments and simulation experiments prove that the proposed procedure effectively controls FWER and FDR. Two mediation analyses on DNA methylation and cancer research are presented: assessing the mediation role of DNA methylation in genLetic regulation of gene expression in primary prostate cancer samples; exploring the possibility of DNA methylation mediating the effect of exercise on prostate cancer progression. Results of data examples include wellL-behaved quantile-quantile plots and improved power to detect novel mediation relationships. An R package HDMT implementing the proposed procedure is freely accessible in CRAN.

摘要

中介分析在流行病学和临床试验中越来越受到关注。在现有方法中,联合显著性(JS)检验会产生过度保守的I型错误率和低功效,特别是对于高维中介假设。在本文中,我们开发了一种多重检验程序,在检验高维中介假设时能准确控制家族性错误率(FWER)和错误发现率(FDR)。我们程序的核心基于估计成分零假设的比例以及p值的潜在混合零分布。理论发展和模拟实验证明,所提出的程序能有效控制FWER和FDR。本文给出了两项关于DNA甲基化和癌症研究的中介分析:评估DNA甲基化在原发性前列腺癌样本中基因表达的遗传调控中的中介作用;探索DNA甲基化介导运动对前列腺癌进展影响的可能性。数据实例的结果包括表现良好的分位数 - 分位数图以及提高了检测新中介关系的功效。一个实现所提出程序的R包HDMT可在CRAN上免费获取。

相似文献

1
A multiple-testing procedure for high-dimensional mediation hypotheses.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2022;117(537):198-213. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1765785. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Large-Scale Hypothesis Testing for Causal Mediation Effects with Applications in Genome-wide Epigenetic Studies.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2022;117(537):67-81. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2021.1914634. Epub 2021 May 19.
3
Adaptive bootstrap tests for composite null hypotheses in the mediation pathway analysis.
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2023 Nov 14;86(2):411-434. doi: 10.1093/jrsssb/qkad129. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Multiple hypotheses testing procedures in clinical trials and genomic studies.
Front Public Health. 2013 Dec 9;1:63. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00063. eCollection 2013.
7
Variance component tests of multivariate mediation effects under composite null hypotheses.
Biometrics. 2019 Dec;75(4):1191-1204. doi: 10.1111/biom.13073. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
8
HIMA2: high-dimensional mediation analysis and its application in epigenome-wide DNA methylation data.
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Jul 25;23(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04748-1.
9
Mediation analysis for survival data with high-dimensional mediators.
Bioinformatics. 2021 Nov 5;37(21):3815-3821. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab564.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypothesis Tests of Indirect Effects for Multiple Mediators.
Stat Methods Appt. 2025 Mar;34(1):113-127. doi: 10.1007/s10260-024-00777-7. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
5
Debiased machine learning for ultra-high dimensional mediation analysis.
Bioinformatics. 2025 Jun 2;41(6). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf282.
10
A novel statistical framework for meta-analysis of total mediation effect with high-dimensional omics mediators in large-scale genomic consortia.
PLoS Genet. 2024 Nov 19;20(11):e1011483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011483. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci.
Nat Genet. 2018 Jul;50(7):928-936. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0142-8. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
Testing for the indirect effect under the null for genome-wide mediation analyses.
Genet Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;41(8):824-833. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22084. Epub 2017 Oct 29.
3
Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues.
Nature. 2017 Oct 11;550(7675):204-213. doi: 10.1038/nature24277.
4
DNA Methylation in Newborns and Maternal Smoking in Pregnancy: Genome-wide Consortium Meta-analysis.
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr 7;98(4):680-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
Mediation analysis for survival data using semiparametric probit models.
Biometrics. 2016 Jun;72(2):563-74. doi: 10.1111/biom.12445. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer.
Cell. 2015 Nov 5;163(4):1011-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.025.
7
The role of regulatory variation in complex traits and disease.
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Apr;16(4):197-212. doi: 10.1038/nrg3891. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
8
Methylation QTLs are associated with coordinated changes in transcription factor binding, histone modifications, and gene expression levels.
PLoS Genet. 2014 Sep 18;10(9):e1004663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004663. eCollection 2014 Sep.
10
Variants at IRX4 as prostate cancer expression quantitative trait loci.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Apr;22(4):558-63. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.195. Epub 2013 Sep 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验