Suppr超能文献

家庭中未接种疫苗的无症状和有症状的 SARS-CoV-2 感染的家庭成员之间的 SARS-CoV-2 传播:一项抗体监测研究。

Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from unvaccinated asymptomatic and symptomatic household members with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: an antibody-surveillance study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics (Bhatt, Plint, Pham Huy, Varshney, Thampi, Alnaji, Zemek), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa; Department of Emergency Medicine (Plint, Alnaji, Zemek), University of Ottawa; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Tang, McGahern, J. Dawson, L. Dawson, Austin), Ottawa, Ont.; Division of Infectious Diseases (Malley), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.; Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology (Pelchat, Arnold, Galipeau, Langlois), Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa; University of Ottawa Centre for Infection, Immunity and Inflammation (Pelchat, Langlois); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Austin), Ottawa, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2022 Apr 12;10(2):E357-E366. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220026. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Household transmission contributes to SARS-CoV-2 spread, but the role of children in transmission is unclear. We conducted a study that included symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in their households with the objective of determining how SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted within households.

METHODS

In this case-ascertained antibody-surveillance study, we enrolled households in Ottawa, Ontario, in which at least 1 household member had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing. The enrolment period was September 2020 to March 2021. Potentially eligible participants were identified if they had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at an academic emergency department or affiliated testing centre; people who learned about the study through the media could also self-identify for participation. At least 2 participants were required for a household to be eligible for study participation, and at least 1 enrolled participant per household had to be a child (age < 18 yr). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to evaluate SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, IgM and IgG against the spike-trimer and nucleocapsid protein. The primary outcome was household secondary attack rate, defined as the proportion of household contacts positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibody among the total number of household contacts participating in the study. We performed descriptive statistics at both the individual and household levels. To estimate and compare outcomes between patient subgroups, and to examine predictors of household transmission, we fitted a series of multivariable logistic regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering of individuals within households.

RESULTS

We enrolled 695 participants from 180 households: 180 index participants (74 children, 106 adults) and 515 of their household contacts (266 children, 249 adults). A total of 487 household contacts (94.6%) (246 children, 241 adults) had SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, of whom 239 had a positive result (secondary attack rate 49.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 42.9%-55.3%). Eighty-eight (36.8%, 95% CI 29.3%-43.2%) of the 239 were asymptomatic; asymptomatic rates were similar for children (51/130 [39.2%, 95% CI 30.7%-48.5%]) and adults (37/115 [32.2%, 95% CI 24.2%-41.4%]) (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.1). Adults were more likely than children to transmit SARS-CoV-2 (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.6). The odds of transmission from asymptomatic (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2-1.4) versus symptomatic (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.4) index participants to household contacts was uncertain. Predictors of household transmission included household density (number of people per bedroom), relationship to index participant and number of cases in the household.

INTERPRETATION

The rate of SARS-CoV-2 transmission within households was nearly 50% during the study period, and children were an important source of spread. The findings suggest that children are an important driver of the COVID-19 pandemic; this should inform public health policy.

摘要

背景

家庭传播导致了 SARS-CoV-2 的传播,但儿童在传播中的作用尚不清楚。我们进行了一项研究,包括接触过 SARS-CoV-2 的有症状和无症状的儿童和成人,目的是确定 SARS-CoV-2 在家中是如何传播的。

方法

在这项病例确定的抗体监测研究中,我们在安大略省渥太华招募了家庭,其中至少有 1 名家庭成员通过逆转录聚合酶链反应检测对 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性。招募期为 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 3 月。如果他们在学术急诊部门或附属检测中心检测出 SARS-CoV-2 呈阳性,则认为潜在的合格参与者具有资格;通过媒体了解这项研究的人也可以自我识别参与。一个家庭至少需要 2 名参与者才有资格参加研究,每个家庭至少有 1 名登记参与者是儿童(年龄<18 岁)。酶联免疫吸附试验用于评估针对刺突三聚体和核衣壳蛋白的 SARS-CoV-2 特异性 IgA、IgM 和 IgG。主要结果是家庭二次攻击率,定义为家庭接触者中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体阳性的家庭接触者比例,总家庭接触者人数为参加研究的人数。我们在个体和家庭两个层面上进行了描述性统计。为了估计和比较患者亚组的结果,并检查家庭传播的预测因素,我们拟合了一系列多变量逻辑回归,采用稳健标准误差来解释个体在家庭内的聚类。

结果

我们从 180 个家庭中招募了 695 名参与者:180 名索引参与者(74 名儿童,106 名成人)和他们的 515 名家庭接触者(266 名儿童,249 名成人)。共有 487 名家庭接触者(94.6%)(246 名儿童,241 名成人)接受了 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测,其中 239 人检测结果呈阳性(二次攻击率 49.1%,95%置信区间[CI]42.9%-55.3%)。88 人(36.8%,95%CI 29.3%-43.2%)为无症状;儿童(51/130[39.2%,95%CI 30.7%-48.5%])和成人(37/115[32.2%,95%CI 24.2%-41.4%])的无症状率相似(比值比[OR]1.3,95%CI 0.8-2.1)。成人比儿童更有可能传播 SARS-CoV-2(OR 2.2,95%CI 1.3-3.6)。无症状(OR 0.6,95%CI 0.2-1.4)与有症状(OR 0.9,95%CI 0.6-1.4)的索引参与者对家庭接触者传播的可能性不确定。家庭传播的预测因素包括家庭密度(每间卧室的人数)、与索引参与者的关系和家庭中的病例数。

解释

在研究期间,家庭内 SARS-CoV-2 的传播率接近 50%,儿童是传播的重要来源。研究结果表明,儿童是 COVID-19 大流行的重要驱动因素;这应该为公共卫生政策提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee3c/9007444/5336c48be801/cmajo.20220026f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验