Department of Laboratory Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Nov 21;77(11):2288-2297. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac081.
Klemera-Doubal's method (KDM) is an advanced and widely applied algorithm for estimating biological age (BA), but it has no uniform paradigm for biomarker processing. This article proposed all subsets of biomarkers for estimating BAs and assessed their association with mortality to determine the most predictive subset and BA.
Clinical biomarkers, including those from physical examinations and blood assays, were assessed in the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) 2009 wave. Those correlated with chronological age (CA) were combined to produce complete subsets, and BA was estimated by KDM from each subset of biomarkers. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to examine and compare each BA's effect size and predictive capacity for all-cause mortality. Validation analysis was performed in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). KD-BA and Levine's BA were compared in all cohorts.
A total of 130 918 panels of BAs were estimated from complete subsets comprising 3-17 biomarkers, whose Pearson coefficients with CA varied from 0.39 to 1. The most predictive subset consisted of 5 biomarkers, whose estimated KD-BA had the most predictive accuracy for all-cause mortality. Compared with Levine's BA, the accuracy of the best-fitting KD-BA in predicting death varied among specific populations.
All-subset analysis could effectively reduce the number of redundant biomarkers and significantly improve the accuracy of KD-BA in predicting all-cause mortality.
Klemera-Doubal 方法(KDM)是一种先进且广泛应用于估算生物年龄(BA)的算法,但它在生物标志物处理方面没有统一的范例。本文提出了用于估算 BA 的所有生物标志物子集,并评估了它们与死亡率的相关性,以确定最具预测性的子集和 BA。
临床生物标志物,包括体检和血液检测中的标志物,在 2009 年中国健康与营养调查(CHNS)中进行了评估。将与实际年龄(CA)相关的标志物组合起来形成完整的子集,并通过 KDM 从每个标志物子集中估算 BA。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型来检查和比较每个 BA 对全因死亡率的效应大小和预测能力。验证分析在中国长寿纵向研究(CLHLS)和国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)中进行。在所有队列中比较了 KD-BA 和 Levine 的 BA。
从包含 3-17 个生物标志物的完整子集中总共估算出 130918 个 BA 面板,它们与 CA 的 Pearson 系数从 0.39 到 1 不等。最具预测性的子集由 5 个标志物组成,其估算的 KD-BA 对全因死亡率的预测准确率最高。与 Levine 的 BA 相比,最佳拟合的 KD-BA 在预测死亡方面的准确性在特定人群中有所不同。
全子集分析可以有效地减少冗余生物标志物的数量,并显著提高 KD-BA 预测全因死亡率的准确性。