Viral Immunology Group, School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, D02 R590 Dublin, Ireland.
Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, D02 VF25 Dublin, Ireland.
Viruses. 2022 Mar 23;14(4):667. doi: 10.3390/v14040667.
Coronaviruses (CoVs) have caused several global outbreaks with relatively high mortality rates, including Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS)-CoV, which emerged in 2012, and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-CoV-1, which appeared in 2002. The recent emergence of SARS-CoV-2 highlights the need for immediate and greater understanding of the immune evasion mechanisms used by CoVs. Interferon (IFN)-α is the body's natural antiviral agent, but its Janus kinase/signal transducer and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signalling pathway is often antagonized by viruses, thereby preventing the upregulation of essential IFN stimulated genes (ISGs). Therapeutic IFN-α has disappointingly weak clinical responses in MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-1 infected patients, indicating that these CoVs inhibit the IFN-α JAK/STAT pathway. Here we show that in lung alveolar A549 epithelial cells expression of MERS-CoV-nsp2 and SARS-CoV-1-nsp14, but not MERS-CoV-nsp5, increased basal levels of total and phosphorylated STAT1 & STAT2 protein, but reduced IFN-α-mediated phosphorylation of STAT1-3 and induction of MxA. While MERS-CoV-nsp2 and SARS-CoV-1-nsp14 similarly increased basal levels of STAT1 and STAT2 in bronchial BEAS-2B epithelial cells, unlike in A549 cells, they did not enhance basal pSTAT1 nor pSTAT2. However, both viral proteins reduced IFN-α-mediated induction of pSTAT1-3 and ISGs (MxA, ISG15 and PKR) in BEAS-2B cells. Furthermore, even though IFN-α-mediated induction of pSTAT1-3 was not affected by MERS-CoV-nsp5 expression in BEAS-2B cells, downstream ISG induction was reduced, revealing that MERS-CoV-nsp5 may use an alternative mechanism to reduce antiviral ISG induction in this cell line. Indeed, we subsequently discovered that all three viral proteins inhibited STAT1 nuclear translocation in BEAS-2B cells, unveiling another layer of inhibition by which these viral proteins suppress responses to Type 1 IFNs. While these observations highlight cell line-specific differences in the immune evasion effects of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-1 proteins, they also demonstrate the broad spectrum of immune evasion strategies these deadly coronaviruses use to stunt antiviral responses to Type IFN.
冠状病毒(CoV)已导致多次全球爆发,死亡率相对较高,包括 2012 年出现的中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)和 2002 年出现的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-1)。最近 SARS-CoV-2 的出现凸显了人们对冠状病毒使用的免疫逃逸机制的即时和更深入的理解的必要性。干扰素(IFN)-α是机体的天然抗病毒剂,但它的 Janus 激酶/信号转导和转录激活剂(JAK/STAT)信号通路经常被病毒拮抗,从而阻止必需的 IFN 刺激基因(ISGs)的上调。治疗性 IFN-α在 MERS-CoV 和 SARS-CoV-1 感染患者中的临床反应令人失望地较弱,表明这些 CoV 抑制 IFN-α JAK/STAT 通路。在这里,我们表明,在肺肺泡 A549 上皮细胞中,MERS-CoV-nsp2 和 SARS-CoV-1-nsp14 的表达,但不是 MERS-CoV-nsp5,增加了总和磷酸化 STAT1 和 STAT2 蛋白的基础水平,但减少了 IFN-α介导的 STAT1-3 的磷酸化和 MxA 的诱导。虽然 MERS-CoV-nsp2 和 SARS-CoV-1-nsp14 相似地增加了支气管 BEAS-2B 上皮细胞中 STAT1 和 STAT2 的基础水平,但与 A549 细胞不同,它们没有增强基础 pSTAT1 或 pSTAT2。然而,两种病毒蛋白都降低了 IFN-α介导的 pSTAT1-3 和 ISGs(MxA、ISG15 和 PKR)在 BEAS-2B 细胞中的诱导。此外,尽管 MERS-CoV-nsp5 在 BEAS-2B 细胞中不影响 IFN-α介导的 pSTAT1-3 的诱导,但下游 ISG 的诱导减少,表明 MERS-CoV-nsp5 可能使用替代机制来减少该细胞系中抗病毒 ISG 的诱导。事实上,我们随后发现,所有三种病毒蛋白都抑制了 BEAS-2B 细胞中 STAT1 的核易位,揭示了这些病毒蛋白抑制对 1 型 IFN 反应的另一个抑制层。虽然这些观察结果突出了 MERS-CoV 和 SARS-CoV-1 蛋白的免疫逃逸效应在细胞系中的特异性差异,但它们也证明了这些致命冠状病毒用于阻止对 1 型 IFN 的抗病毒反应的广泛免疫逃逸策略。