Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Center for Research in Reproduction and Women's health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;227(4):560-570. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.033. Epub 2022 May 18.
For more than a century, substantial racial and ethnic inequities in perinatal health outcomes have persisted despite technical clinical advances and changes in public health practice that lowered the overall incidence of morbidity. Race is a social construct and not an inherent biologic or genetic reality; therefore, racial differences in health outcomes represent the consequences of structural racism or the inequitable distribution of opportunities for health along racialized lines. Clinicians and scientists in obstetrics and gynecology have a responsibility to work to eliminate health inequities for Black, Brown, and Indigenous birthing people, and fulfilling this responsibility requires actionable evidence from high-quality research. To generate this actionable evidence, the research community must realign paradigms, praxis, and infrastructure with an eye directed toward reproductive justice and antiracism. This special report offers a set of key recommendations as a roadmap to transform perinatal health research to achieve health equity. The recommendations are based on expert opinion and evidence presented at the State of the Science Research Symposium at the 41st Annual Pregnancy Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine in 2021. Recommendations fall into 3 broad categories-changing research paradigms, reforming research praxis, and transforming research infrastructure-and are grounded in a historic foundation of the advances and shortcomings of clinical, public health, and sociologic scholarship in health equity. Changing the research paradigm requires leveraging a multidisciplinary perspective on structural racism; promoting mechanistic research that identifies the biologic pathways perturbed by structural racism; and utilizing conceptual models that account for racism as a factor in adverse perinatal outcomes. Changing praxis approaches to promote and engage multidisciplinary teams and to develop standardized guidelines for data collection will ensure that paradigm shifts center the historically marginalized voices of Black, Brown, and Indigenous birthing people. Finally, infrastructure changes that embed community-centered approaches are required to make shifts in paradigm and praxis possible. Institutional policies that break down silos and support true community partnership, and also the alignment of institutional, funding, and academic publishing objectives with strategic priorities for perinatal health equity, are paramount. Achieving health equity requires shifting the structures that support the ecosystem of racism that Black, Brown, and Indigenous birthing people must navigate before, during, and after childbearing. These structures extend beyond the healthcare system in which clinicians operate day-to-day, but they cannot be excluded from research endeavors to create the actionable evidence needed to achieve perinatal health equity.
一个多世纪以来,尽管技术临床进步和公共卫生实践的改变降低了整体发病率,但围产期健康结果仍存在大量的种族和民族不平等现象。种族是一种社会建构,而不是内在的生物或遗传现实;因此,健康结果的种族差异代表了结构性种族主义或沿着种族化路线分配健康机会的不平等的后果。妇产科医生和科学家有责任努力消除黑人、棕色人种和土著分娩者的健康不平等,履行这一责任需要高质量研究提供可行的证据。为了产生这种可行的证据,研究界必须调整范式、实践和基础设施,着眼于生殖正义和反种族主义。本特别报告提供了一系列关键建议,作为将围产期健康研究转变为实现健康公平的路线图。这些建议是基于专家意见和在 2021 年第 41 届母胎医学学会妊娠会议科学研究研讨会上提出的证据。建议分为三大类——改变研究范式、改革研究实践和转变研究基础设施——并基于临床、公共卫生和社会学在健康公平方面的学术成果的历史基础。改变研究范式需要利用对结构性种族主义的多学科视角;促进识别结构性种族主义扰乱的生物途径的机制研究;并利用将种族主义视为不良围产期结局因素的概念模型。改变实践方法以促进和参与多学科团队,并制定数据收集的标准化准则,将确保范式转变将黑人、棕色人种和土著分娩者的历史边缘化声音置于中心位置。最后,需要进行基础设施变革,以实现范式和实践的转变。打破壁垒、支持真正的社区伙伴关系的机构政策,以及将机构、资金和学术出版目标与围产期健康公平的战略重点对齐,是至关重要的。实现健康公平需要改变支持种族主义生态系统的结构,黑人、棕色人种和土著分娩者在生育前后必须在其中进行导航。这些结构不仅限于医生日常运作的医疗体系,但在为实现围产期健康公平而开展的研究中不能将其排除在外,因为这是实现健康公平所需要的可行证据。