Department of Pathology, Stanford Universitygrid.168010.e School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Jun 15;60(6):e0218721. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02187-21. Epub 2022 May 25.
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is routinely diagnosed by PCR, with or without toxin enzyme immunoassay testing. The role of therapy for positive PCR and negative toxin remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether clinical outcomes of PCR/cycle threshold-based toxin (CT-toxin) individuals vary by result reporting and treatment strategy. We performed a quasiexperimental noninferiority study comparing clinical outcomes of PCR/CT-toxin individuals by reporting PCR result only (most patients treated) with reporting CT-toxin result only (most patients untreated) in a single-center, tertiary academic hospital. The primary outcome was symptomatic PCR/CT-toxin conversion at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included 7-day diarrhea resolution, hospital length of stay, and 30-day all-cause mortality. A total of 663 PCR/CT-toxin test results were analyzed from 632 individuals with a median age of 61 years (interquartile range [IQR], 44 to 72) and 50.4% immunocompromised. Individuals in the preintervention group were more likely to have received CDI therapy than those in the intervention group (91.5 versus 15.1%; < 0.001). Symptomatic toxin conversion at 8 weeks and hospital length of stay failed to establish the predefined thresholds for noninferiority. Lack of diarrhea resolution at 7 days and 30-day all-cause mortality was similar and established noninferiority (20.0 versus 13.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.57; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 1.01; = 0.1; and 8.6 versus 6.5%; aOR, 0.46; 90% CI, 0.20 to 1.04; = 0.12). These data support the safety of withholding antibiotics for selected hospitalized individuals with suspected CDI but negative toxin.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)通常通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)诊断,可结合或不结合毒素酶免疫测定检测。阳性 PCR 和阴性毒素的治疗作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定基于 PCR/循环阈值的毒素(CT-毒素)个体的临床结果是否因报告结果和治疗策略的不同而不同。我们在一家单中心三级学术医院进行了一项准实验性非劣效性研究,比较了报告仅 PCR 结果(大多数患者接受治疗)和仅报告 CT-毒素结果(大多数患者未接受治疗)的 PCR/CT-毒素个体的临床结果。主要结局是 8 周时出现症状性 PCR/CT-毒素转换。次要结局包括 7 天腹泻缓解、住院时间和 30 天全因死亡率。从 632 名患者的 663 个 PCR/CT-毒素检测结果中进行了分析,患者的中位年龄为 61 岁(四分位距[IQR],44 至 72),50.4%为免疫功能低下。在干预前组中,接受 CDI 治疗的个体比干预组更有可能(91.5%比 15.1%;<0.001)。8 周时出现症状性毒素转换和住院时间未达到预先设定的非劣效性阈值。7 天和 30 天的腹泻缓解率和全因死亡率相似,且达到非劣效性(20.0%比 13.7%;调整后的比值比[aOR],0.57;90%置信区间[CI],0.32 至 1.01;=0.1;和 8.6%比 6.5%;aOR,0.46;90%CI,0.20 至 1.04;=0.12)。这些数据支持对疑似 CDI 但毒素阴性的选定住院患者选择性使用抗生素的安全性。