Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216260. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16260.
The pool of studies examining ethnic and racial differences in hospice use and end-of-life hospitalizations among patients with dementia is limited and results are conflicting, making it difficult to assess health care needs of underresourced racial and ethnic groups.
To explore differences in end-of-life utilization of hospice and hospital services among patients with dementia by race and ethnicity.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used national survey data from the Health and Retirement Study linked with Medicare and Medicaid claims that reflected a range of socioeconomic, health, and psychosocial characteristics. Eligible participants were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older diagnosed with dementia who died between 2000 and 2016. Analyses were performed from June to December 2021.
Race and ethnicity.
We examined the frequency and costs of hospice care, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations during the last 180 days of life among Medicare decedents with dementia. We analyzed the proportion of dementia decedents with advance care planning and their end-of-life care preferences.
The cohort sample included 5058 beneficiaries with dementia (mean [SD] age, 85.5 [8.0] years; 3038 women [60.1%]; 809 [16.0%] non-Hispanic Black, 357 [7.1%] Hispanic, and 3892 non-Hispanic White respondents [76.9%]). In adjusted analysis, non-Hispanic Black decedents (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.78), nursing home residents (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93), and survey respondents represented by a proxy (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99) were less likely to use hospice, whereas older decedents (age 75-84 vs 65-74 years: OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.12-1.72; age ≥85 vs 65-74 years: OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13-1.71), women (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35), and decedents with higher education (high school vs less than high school: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.36; more than high school vs less than high school: OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.54), more severe cognitive impairment (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.02-2.23), and more instrumental activities of daily living limitations (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12) were associated with higher hospice enrollment. A higher proportion of Black and Hispanic decedents with dementia used ED (645 of 809 [79.7%] and 274 of 357 [76.8%] vs 2753 of 3892 [70.7%]; P < .001) and inpatient services (625 of 809 [77.3%] and 275 of 357 [77.0%] vs 2630 of 3892 [67.5%]; P < .001) and incurred roughly 60% higher inpatient expenditures at the end of life compared with White decedents (estimated mean: Black, $23 279; 95% CI, $20 690-$25 868; Hispanic, $23 471; 95% CI, $19 532-$27 410 vs White, $14 609; 95% CI, $13 800-$15 418). A higher proportion of Black and Hispanic than White beneficiaries with dementia who were enrolled in hospice were subsequently admitted to the ED (56 of 309 [18.1%] and 22 of 153 [14.4%] vs 191 of 1967 [9.7%]; P < .001) or hospital (48 of 309 [15.5%] and 17 of 153 [11.1%] vs 119 of 1967 [6.0%]; P < .001) before death. The proportion of dementia beneficiaries completing advance care planning was lower among Black (146 of 704 [20.7%]) and Hispanic (66 of 308 [21.4%]) beneficiaries compared with White beneficiaries (1871 of 3274 [57.1%]). A higher proportion of Black and Hispanic decedents with dementia had written instructions choosing all care possible to prolong life (30 of 144 [20.8%] and 12 of 65 [18.4%] vs 72 of 1852 [3.9%]), whereas a higher proportion of White decedents preferred to limit care in certain situations (1708 of 1840 [92.8%] vs 114 of 141 [80.9%] and 51 of 64 [79.7%]), withhold treatments (1448 of 1799 [80.5%] vs 87 of 140 [62.1%] and 41 of 62 [66.1%]), and forgo extensive life-prolonging measures (1712 of 1838 [93.1%] vs 120 of 138 [87.0%] and 54 of 65 [83.1%]).
The results of this cohort study highlight unique end-of-life care utilization and treatment preferences across racial and ethnic groups among patients with dementia. Medicare should consider alternative payment models to promote culturally competent end-of-life care and reduce low-value interventions and costs among the population with dementia.
研究痴呆患者在使用临终关怀和临终住院方面的种族和民族差异的研究文献有限,结果相互矛盾,这使得难以评估资源匮乏的种族和族裔群体的医疗保健需求。
探讨痴呆患者在临终时使用临终关怀和医院服务方面的种族和民族差异。
设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究使用了全国调查数据,该数据来自健康与退休研究,与医疗保险和医疗补助索赔数据相关联,反映了一系列社会经济、健康和心理社会特征。合格的参与者是 Medicare 按服务付费受益人,年龄在 65 岁及以上,被诊断患有痴呆症,并在 2000 年至 2016 年期间死亡。分析于 2021 年 6 月至 12 月进行。
种族和民族。
我们检查了 Medicare 死者中痴呆患者在生命最后 180 天内接受临终关怀、急诊(ED)就诊和住院治疗的频率和费用。我们分析了有预先护理计划的痴呆患者的比例以及他们的临终护理偏好。
队列样本包括 5058 名患有痴呆症的受益人(平均[标准差]年龄,85.5[8.0]岁;3038 名女性[60.1%];809 名非西班牙裔黑人[16.0%],357 名西班牙裔[7.1%]和 3892 名非西班牙裔白人[76.9%])。在调整分析中,非西班牙裔黑人死者(比值比[OR],0.65;95%置信区间[CI],0.55-0.78)、疗养院居民(OR,0.81;95%CI,0.71-0.93)和由代理人代表的调查受访者(OR,0.84;95%CI,0.71-0.99)不太可能使用临终关怀,而年龄较大的死者(75-84 岁与 65-74 岁:OR,1.39;95%CI,1.12-1.72;年龄≥85 岁与 65-74 岁:OR,1.39;95%CI,1.13-1.71)、女性(OR,1.19;95%CI,1.05-1.35)和受教育程度较高的死者(高中及以上 vs 未高中毕业:OR,1.17;95%CI,1.01-1.36;高中以上 vs 未高中毕业:OR,1.32;95%CI,1.13-1.54)、认知障碍更严重(OR,1.51;95%CI,1.02-2.23)和日常活动能力受限(OR,1.07;95%CI,1.01-1.12)的患者更有可能接受临终关怀。更多的黑人和西班牙裔痴呆患者使用 ED(645 例/809 例[79.7%]和 274 例/357 例[76.8%]与 2753 例/3892 例[70.7%];P <.001)和住院服务(625 例/809 例[77.3%]和 275 例/357 例[77.0%]与 2630 例/3892 例[67.5%];P <.001),并且与白人死者相比,临终时的住院费用高出约 60%(估计平均费用:黑人,23279 美元;95%CI,20690-25868 美元;西班牙裔,23471 美元;95%CI,19532-27410 美元 vs 白人,14609 美元;95%CI,13800-15418 美元)。与白人受益人大脑中更多的黑人和西班牙裔痴呆患者在接受临终关怀后被随后收治到急诊(56 例/309 例[18.1%]和 22 例/153 例[14.4%]与 191 例/1967 例[9.7%];P <.001)或医院(48 例/309 例[15.5%]和 17 例/153 例[11.1%]与 119 例/1967 例[6.0%];P <.001)。与白人受益人大脑中有更多的黑人和西班牙裔痴呆患者完成预先护理计划(704 例中的 146 例[20.7%]和 308 例中的 66 例[21.4%]与 3274 例中的 1871 例[57.1%])。与白人受益人大脑中有更多的黑人和西班牙裔痴呆患者有书面指示选择所有可能延长生命的治疗方法(30 例/144 例[20.8%]和 12 例/65 例[18.4%]与 72 例/1852 例[3.9%]),而更多的白人受益人大脑中更倾向于在某些情况下限制治疗(1708 例/1840 例[92.8%]与 114 例/141 例[80.9%]和 51 例/64 例[79.7%]),拒绝治疗(1448 例/1799 例[80.5%]与 87 例/140 例[62.1%]和 41 例/62 例[66.1%])和放弃广泛的延长生命措施(1712 例/1838 例[93.1%]与 120 例/138 例[87.0%]和 54 例/65 例[83.1%])。
本队列研究的结果突出了痴呆患者在临终时在不同种族和族裔群体中独特的临终关怀利用和治疗偏好。医疗保险应考虑采用替代支付模式,以促进对痴呆患者的文化上有能力的临终关怀,并减少该人群的低价值干预措施和成本。