Suppr超能文献

西达基奥仑赛对比挽救化疗后自体干细胞移植作为二线治疗复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的标准治疗(TRANSFORM):一项开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验的中期分析结果。

Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Hematologic Malignancies and Stem Cell Transplantation, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.

Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2022 Jun 18;399(10343):2294-2308. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00662-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) primary refractory to or relapsed within 12 months of first-line therapy are at high risk for poor outcomes with current standard of care, platinum-based salvage immunochemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), an autologous, CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has previously demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in third-line or later LBCL. In this Article, we report a prespecified interim analysis of liso-cel versus standard of care as second-line treatment for primary refractory or early relapsed (within 12 months after response to initial therapy) LBCL.

METHODS

TRANSFORM is a global, phase 3 study, conducted in 47 sites in the USA, Europe, and Japan, comparing liso-cel with standard of care as second-line therapy in patients with primary refractory or early (≤12 months) relapsed LBCL. Adults aged 18-75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 1 or less, adequate organ function, PET-positive disease per Lugano 2014 criteria, and candidates for autologous HSCT were randomly assigned (1:1), by use of interactive response technology, to liso-cel (100 × 10 CAR T cells intravenously) or standard of care. Standard of care consisted of three cycles of salvage immunochemotherapy delivered intravenously-R-DHAP (rituximab 375 mg/m on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, two infusions of cytarabine 2000 mg/m on day 2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m on day 1), R-ICE (rituximab 375 mg/m on day 1, ifosfamide 5000 mg/m on day 2, etoposide 100 mg/m on days 1-3, and carboplatin area under the curve 5 [maximum dose of 800 mg] on day 2), or R-GDP (rituximab 375 mg/m on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m on day 1)-followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT in responders. Primary endpoint was event-free survival, with response assessments by an independent review committee per Lugano 2014 criteria. Efficacy was assessed per intention-to-treat (ie, all randomly assigned patients) and safety in patients who received any treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03575351, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 23, 2018, and Dec 8, 2020, 232 patients were screened and 184 were assigned to the liso-cel (n=92) or standard of care (n=92) groups. At the data cutoff for this interim analysis, March 8, 2021, the median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 4·4-11·5). Median event-free survival was significantly improved in the liso-cel group (10·1 months [95% CI 6·1-not reached]) compared with the standard-of-care group (2·3 months [2·2-4·3]; stratified hazard ratio 0·35; 95% CI 0·23-0·53; stratified Cox proportional hazards model one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (74 [80%] of 92 patients in the liso-cel group vs 46 [51%] of 91 patients in the standard-of-care group), anaemia (45 [49%] vs 45 [49%]), thrombocytopenia (45 [49%] vs 58 [64%]), and prolonged cytopenia (40 [43%] vs three [3%]). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events, which are associated with CAR T-cell therapy, occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) of 92 patients in the liso-cel group, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 44 (48%) patients in the liso-cel group and 44 (48%) in the standard-of-care group. No new liso-cel safety concerns were identified in the second-line setting. There were no treatment-related deaths in the liso-cel group and one treatment-related death due to sepsis in the standard-of-care group.

INTERPRETATION

These results support liso-cel as a new second-line treatment recommendation in patients with early relapsed or refractory LBCL.

FUNDING

Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

摘要

背景

对于一线治疗后 12 个月内复发或原发难治的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者,目前标准的含铂挽救性免疫化疗联合自体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)治疗预后较差。Lisocabtagene maraleucel(liso-cel)是一种自体、靶向 CD19 的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法,既往在三线或更后线 LBCL 中显示出疗效和可管理的安全性。在此文中,我们报告了 liso-cel 与标准护理作为原发性难治或早期(初始治疗后 12 个月内)复发 LBCL 二线治疗的预设中期分析。

方法

TRANSFORM 是一项全球性的、三期研究,在美国、欧洲和日本的 47 个地点进行,将 liso-cel 与标准护理作为原发性难治或早期(≤12 个月)复发 LBCL 患者的二线治疗进行比较。年龄在 18-75 岁之间、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为 1 或以下、器官功能良好、根据卢加诺 2014 标准 PET 阳性疾病、且适合自体 HSCT 的患者,通过使用交互式反应技术,按 1:1 的比例随机分配到 liso-cel(静脉注射 100 × 10 CAR T 细胞)或标准护理组。标准护理包括三周期的静脉挽救性免疫化疗-R-DHAP(第 1 天给予利妥昔单抗 375 mg/m2,第 1-4 天给予地塞米松 40 mg,第 2 天给予两次阿糖胞苷 2000 mg/m2,第 1 天给予顺铂 100 mg/m2)、R-ICE(第 1 天给予利妥昔单抗 375 mg/m2,如果氟尿嘧啶 5000 mg/m2,依托泊苷 100 mg/m2,第 1-3 天,第 2 天给予卡铂 AUC5[最大剂量 800 mg])或 R-GDP(第 1 天给予利妥昔单抗 375 mg/m2,第 1-4 天给予地塞米松 40 mg,第 1 和 8 天给予吉西他滨 1000 mg/m2,第 1 天给予顺铂 75 mg/m2)-然后在缓解者中进行高剂量化疗和自体 HSCT。主要终点是无事件生存,通过独立审查委员会根据卢加诺 2014 标准进行评估。疗效根据意向治疗(即所有随机分配的患者)和接受任何治疗的患者的安全性进行评估。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT03575351,正在进行中。

结果

2018 年 10 月 23 日至 2020 年 12 月 8 日,对 232 名患者进行了筛选,184 名患者被分配到 liso-cel(n=92)或标准护理组(n=92)。在本次中期分析的数据截止日期(2021 年 3 月 8 日),中位随访时间为 6.2 个月(IQR 4.4-11.5)。中位无事件生存明显延长 liso-cel 组(10.1 个月[95%CI 6.1-未达到])与标准护理组(2.3 个月[2.2-4.3];分层风险比 0.35;95%CI 0.23-0.53;分层 Cox 比例风险模型单侧 p<0.0001)。最常见的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件是中性粒细胞减少症(liso-cel 组 92 例中有 74 例[80%],标准护理组 91 例中有 46 例[51%])、贫血(45 例[49%] vs 45 例[49%])、血小板减少症(45 例[49%] vs 58 例[64%])和长期血细胞减少症(40 例[43%] vs 3 例[3%])。与 CAR T 细胞治疗相关的 3 级细胞因子释放综合征和神经系统事件在 liso-cel 组中分别发生在 1 例(1%)和 4 例(4%)患者中(无 4 级或 5 级事件)。liso-cel 组有 44 例(48%)患者和标准护理组有 44 例(48%)患者发生严重治疗相关不良事件。在二线治疗中未发现 liso-cel 的新安全性问题。liso-cel 组无治疗相关死亡,标准护理组有 1 例因败血症导致的治疗相关死亡。

解释

这些结果支持 liso-cel 作为早期复发或难治性 LBCL 患者的新二线治疗推荐。

资金来源

Celgene,百时美施贵宝公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验