Suppr超能文献

按孕妇肥胖类别划分,孕期体重增加未达而非处于指南范围:产科和新生儿结局的系统评价与荟萃分析

Gestational weight gain below instead of within the guidelines per class of maternal obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

作者信息

Mustafa Hiba J, Seif Karl, Javinani Ali, Aghajani Faezeh, Orlinsky Rachel, Alvarez Maria Vera, Ryan Amanda, Crimmins Sarah

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN (Dr Mustafa); The Fetal Center at Riley Children's Health, Indianapolis, IN (Dr Mustafa).

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Drs Seif and Crimmins).

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Sep;4(5):100682. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100682. Epub 2022 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically investigate a wide range of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes as they relate to gestational weight gain less than the current Institute of Medicine and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines when compared with weight gain within the guideline range and to stratify outcomes by the class of obesity and by the type of study analysis.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched studies on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from 2009 to April 30, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies related to gestational weight gain less than the current Institute of Medicine and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines in comparison with weight gain within the guidelines among women with obesity overall (body mass index >30 kg/m) and/or a specific class of obesity (I: body mass index, 30-34.9 kg/m; II: body mass index, 35-39.9 kg/m; and III: body mass index >40 kg/m).

METHODS

Among the studies that met the inclusion criteria, multiple obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were tabulated and compared between pregnancies with weight gain less than recommended in the guidelines and those with weight gain within the guidelines, further classified by the class of obesity if applicable. Primary outcomes included small for gestational age neonates, large for gestational age neonates, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery, preterm birth, postpartum weight retention, and composite neonatal morbidity. A meta-analysis of univariate and adjusted multivariate analysis studies was conducted. The random-effect model was used to pool the mean differences or odds ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I value. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess individual study quality.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies reporting on 30,245,946 pregnancies were included of which 11,515,411 pregnancies were in the univariate analysis and 18,730,535 pregnancies were in the adjusted multivariate analysis. In the meta-analysis of univariate studies, compared with women who gained weight as recommended in the guidelines, those who gained less than the weight recommended in the guidelines had higher odds of having a small for gestational age neonate among those with obesity class I and II (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.45; I=0%; P<.00001; and odds ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.85; I=0%; P<.00001, respectively). However, the incidence of small for gestational age neonates was below the expected limits (<10%) and was not associated with increased neonatal morbidity. Furthermore, after adjusting for covariates, that difference was not statistically significant anymore. The difference was not statistically significant for class III obesity. Following adjusted multivariate analysis, no significant differences in small for gestational age rates were noted for any classes of obesity between groups. Significantly lower odds for large for gestational age neonates were seen in the group with gestational weight gain less than the recommended guidelines among those with obesity class I, II, and III (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.73; I=0%; P<.00001; odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.74; I=0%; P<.00001; and odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.75; I=34%; P<.00001, respectively), and similar findings were seen in the adjusted multivariate analysis. Women with weight gain less than the recommended guidelines had significantly lower odds for preeclampsia among those with obesity class I, II, and III (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.79; I=0%; P<.00001; odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.91; I=0%; P<.00001; and odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.94; I=0%; P=.006, respectively), and similar findings were seen in the adjusted multivariate analysis. No significant differences were seen in gestational diabetes mellitus between groups. Regarding preterm birth, available univariate analysis studies only reported on overall obesity and mixed iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm birth showing a significant increase in the odds of preterm birth (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.43; I=0%; P<.00001) among women with low weight gain, whereas the adjusted multivariate studies in overall obesity and in all 3 classes showed no significant differences in preterm birth between groups. Women with low weight gain had significantly lower odds for cesarean delivery in obesity class I, II, and III (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.81; I=0%; P<.00001; odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.87; I=0%; P<.00001; and odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.91; I=0%; P<.00001, respectively), and similar findings were seen in the adjusted multivariate analysis. There was significantly lower odds for postpartum weight retention (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.82; I=0%; P=.03) and lower odds for composite neonatal morbidity in the overall obesity group with low gestational weight gain (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.99; I=19.6%; P=.04).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to previous reports, the current systematic review and meta-analysis showed no significant increase in small for gestational age rates in pregnancies with weight gain below the current guidelines for all classes of maternal obesity. Furthermore, gaining less weight than recommended in the guidelines was associated with lower large for gestational age, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery rates. Our study provides the evidence that the current recommended gestational weight gain range is high for all classes of obesity. These results provide pertinent information supporting the notion to revisit the current gestational weight gain recommendations for women with obesity and furthermore to classify them by the class of obesity rather than by an overall obesity category as is done in the current recommendations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统调查一系列产科和新生儿结局,这些结局与孕期体重增加低于美国医学研究所及美国妇产科医师学会当前指南的情况有关,并将其与处于指南推荐体重增加范围内的情况进行比较,同时按肥胖类别和研究分析类型对结局进行分层。

数据来源

我们系统检索了2009年至2021年4月30日期间PubMed、Scopus、Embase和Cochrane图书馆上的研究。

研究纳入标准

报告单胎妊娠产科和新生儿结局的研究,这些结局与孕期体重增加低于美国医学研究所及美国妇产科医师学会当前指南的情况有关,比较对象为总体肥胖(体重指数>30kg/m²)和/或特定肥胖类别(I类:体重指数30 - 34.9kg/m²;II类:体重指数35 - 39.9kg/m²;III类:体重指数>40kg/m²)的女性中体重增加处于指南范围内的情况。

方法

在符合纳入标准的研究中,将多个产科和新生儿结局制成表格,并对孕期体重增加低于指南推荐值的妊娠与体重增加处于指南范围内的妊娠进行比较,若适用,进一步按肥胖类别分类。主要结局包括小于胎龄儿、大于胎龄儿、子痫前期和妊娠期糖尿病。次要结局包括剖宫产、早产、产后体重滞留和新生儿复合发病率。对单变量和校正多变量分析研究进行了荟萃分析。采用随机效应模型汇总平均差异或比值比以及相应的95%置信区间。使用I²值评估异质性。采用纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华量表评估个体研究质量。

结果

共纳入54项报告30245946例妊娠的研究其中11515411例妊娠用于单变量分析,18730535例妊娠用于校正多变量分析。在单变量研究的荟萃分析中,与体重增加符合指南推荐的女性相比,体重增加低于指南推荐值的I类和II类肥胖女性生出小于胎龄儿的几率更高(比值比分别为1.30;95%置信区间为1.17 - 1.45;I² = 0%;P <.00001;以及比值比为1.56;95%置信区间为1.31 - 1.85;I² = 0%;P <.00

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验