Suppr超能文献

不同膳食氨基酸作为肠道氨基酸转运诱导剂的比较。

Comparison of different dietary amino acids as inducers of intestinal amino acid transport.

作者信息

Stein E D, Chang S D, Diamond J M

出版信息

Am J Physiol. 1987 May;252(5 Pt 1):G626-35. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1987.252.5.G626.

Abstract

Intestinal amino acid (AA) transporters are known to be induced by raised levels of dietary protein or free AA mixtures, but little is known about whether certain AAs are more potent inducers than others. Hence we compared, in mouse jejunum, the inductive effects of seven different AAs (given to mice as dietary supplements) on the brush-border uptake of five solutes predominantly taken up via different transporters. The AAs tested as dietary supplements included one imino acid, two acidic AAs, two basic AAs, and two neutral AAs. The solutes whose uptakes we studied were D-glucose plus preferential substrates for the acidic AA, basic AA, neutral AA, and imino acid transporter. Mouse growth rates were consistently higher for dietary supplementation with nonessential than essential AAs, but there were no ration-related differences in intestinal morphometric parameters and almost none in active D-glucose uptake. AA transport is regulated independently of D-glucose transport. The four AA transporters are regulated semi-independently on each other: e.g., aspartate is a good inducer for only two of the four transporters, arginine for one or two, lysine for just one. Different AAs differ in their potencies at inducing the same AA transporter. In a few cases good substrates make good inducers (e.g., aspartate of the acidic AA transporter, valine of the neutral AA transporter). But often this is not true: the acidic AA aspartate is the best inducer of the basic AA transporter; the basic AA arginine but not lysine is a good inducer of the acidic AA transporter; and the imino acid proline is not a good inducer of the imino acid transporter. The adaptive significance of these discrepancies between inducers and transported substrates is unclear. Thus the differing dietary values of different AAs may be related to their differing values as inducers of AA transport, in addition to their well-known differing biosynthetic values as essential or nonessential nutrients.

摘要

已知肠道氨基酸(AA)转运体可被膳食蛋白质或游离氨基酸混合物水平升高所诱导,但对于某些氨基酸是否比其他氨基酸更具诱导作用却知之甚少。因此,我们在小鼠空肠中比较了七种不同氨基酸(作为膳食补充剂给予小鼠)对主要通过不同转运体摄取的五种溶质刷状缘摄取的诱导作用。作为膳食补充剂测试的氨基酸包括一种亚氨基酸、两种酸性氨基酸、两种碱性氨基酸和两种中性氨基酸。我们研究其摄取的溶质是D-葡萄糖以及酸性氨基酸、碱性氨基酸、中性氨基酸和亚氨基酸转运体的优先底物。膳食补充非必需氨基酸时小鼠的生长速率始终高于补充必需氨基酸时,但肠道形态学参数与日粮无关,活性D-葡萄糖摄取几乎也无差异。氨基酸转运的调节独立于D-葡萄糖转运。四种氨基酸转运体相互之间是半独立调节的:例如,天冬氨酸仅对四种转运体中的两种是良好的诱导剂,精氨酸对一种或两种是良好的诱导剂,赖氨酸仅对一种是良好的诱导剂。不同氨基酸诱导同一氨基酸转运体的能力不同。在少数情况下,良好的底物也是良好的诱导剂(例如,酸性氨基酸转运体的天冬氨酸、中性氨基酸转运体的缬氨酸)。但情况往往并非如此:酸性氨基酸天冬氨酸是碱性氨基酸转运体的最佳诱导剂;碱性氨基酸精氨酸而非赖氨酸是酸性氨基酸转运体的良好诱导剂;亚氨基酸脯氨酸不是亚氨基酸转运体的良好诱导剂。诱导剂与转运底物之间这些差异的适应性意义尚不清楚。因此,不同氨基酸的不同膳食价值可能与其作为氨基酸转运诱导剂的不同价值有关,此外还与其作为必需或非必需营养素的众所周知的不同生物合成价值有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验