Suppr超能文献

将记忆外包给外部工具:对“意图卸载”的综述。

Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of 'Intention Offloading'.

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AZ, UK.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):60-76. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

Abstract

How do we remember delayed intentions? Three decades of research into prospective memory have provided insight into the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in this form of memory. However, we depend on more than just our brains to remember intentions. We also use external props and tools such as calendars and diaries, strategically placed objects, and technologies such as smartphone alerts. This is known as 'intention offloading'. Despite the progress in our understanding of brain-based prospective memory, we know much less about the role of intention offloading in individuals' ability to fulfil delayed intentions. Here, we review recent research into intention offloading, with a particular focus on how individuals decide between storing intentions in internal memory versus external reminders. We also review studies investigating how intention offloading changes across the lifespan and how it relates to underlying brain mechanisms. We conclude that intention offloading is highly effective, experimentally tractable, and guided by metacognitive processes. Individuals have systematic biases in their offloading strategies that are stable over time. Evidence also suggests that individual differences and developmental changes in offloading strategies are driven at least in part by metacognitive processes. Therefore, metacognitive interventions could play an important role in promoting individuals' adaptive use of cognitive tools.

摘要

我们如何记住延迟的意图?三十年来对前瞻性记忆的研究为理解这种记忆形式所涉及的认知和神经机制提供了深入的了解。然而,我们不仅仅依靠大脑来记住意图。我们还使用外部道具和工具,如日历和日记、战略性放置的物品以及智能手机提醒等技术。这被称为“意图卸载”。尽管我们对基于大脑的前瞻性记忆的理解取得了进展,但我们对意图卸载在个体履行延迟意图的能力中的作用知之甚少。在这里,我们回顾了最近关于意图卸载的研究,特别关注个体如何在内部记忆和外部提醒之间做出存储意图的决策。我们还回顾了研究意图卸载如何随时间在整个生命周期中变化以及它与潜在的大脑机制有何关系的研究。我们的结论是,意图卸载是非常有效的,在实验上是可行的,并且受到元认知过程的指导。个体在其卸载策略中有系统的偏见,这些偏见是随着时间的推移而稳定的。有证据表明,卸载策略的个体差异和发展变化至少部分是由元认知过程驱动的。因此,元认知干预措施可能在促进个体自适应地使用认知工具方面发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce0d/9971128/1427749c44e9/13423_2022_2139_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验