Oliveira Patrícia Santos, Ferreira Meire Coelho, Paula Natália Gomes Nascimento, Loguercio Alessandro Dourado, Grazziotin-Soares Renata, da Silva Gisele Rodrigues, da Mata Helena Cristina Santos, Bauer José, Carvalho Ceci Nunes
Postgraduate Program of Dentistry, CEUMA University, São Luís 65065-470, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa 84010-330, Brazil.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 1;11(13):3816. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133816.
Aim: The development of postoperative pain following root canal instrumentation may impair patient’s comfort and undermine their trust in the dentist. This study assessed the effect of root canal instrumentation techniques (rotary (PTN; ProTaper Next®) and reciprocating (R; Reciproc®)) on the postoperative pain intensity (primary outcome) and tenderness on biting (secondary outcome) of patients’ asymptomatic molars. Methodology: This study protocol was registered with ReBec-WHO (U1111-1182-2800). From a pool of 112 patients evaluated for eligibility (healthy adults (≤18 years old)), with a single asymptomatic molar (maxillary or mandibular) indicated for root canal treatment, diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis (including chronic hyperplastic pulpitis), 75 were randomly allocated in similar proportions to receive the intervention (two-appointment root canal therapy) in either the PTN or R group. The allocated procedures were performed using standardized protocols. Participants (blinded to the instrumentation technique) rated their pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24 h and from day 2 to day 7 following the root canal instrumentation appointment using a VAS and an NRS; the ibuprofen tablets taken and the presence of tenderness on biting were recorded. The instrumentation time was registered. Univariate and multivariate statistics measured the effect of independent variables on the outcomes. Results: From the 75 patients allocated, 8 patients (4 from each group) were lost; in total, 33 patients were analyzed in the PTN group and 34 in the R group. The frequencies of postoperative pain (p > 0.05) and tenderness on biting (p > 0.05) were similar between groups. The medication intake (mean of 1.31 tablets) and the time of instrumentation (approximately 11 min) were similar between groups. Conclusion: ProTaper Next and Reciproc® caused a slight risk of tenderness on biting and contributed to similar self-reported postoperative pain (low intensity) up to 7 days following root canal shaping.
根管预备术后疼痛的出现可能会影响患者的舒适度,并削弱他们对牙医的信任。本研究评估了根管预备技术(旋转法(PTN;ProTaper Next®)和往复法(R;Reciproc®))对无症状磨牙患者术后疼痛强度(主要结局)和咬诊压痛(次要结局)的影响。方法:本研究方案已在ReBec-WHO(U1111-1182-2800)注册。从112名接受资格评估的患者(≤18岁的健康成年人)中,选取一颗上颌或下颌的无症状磨牙需进行根管治疗,诊断为无症状性不可逆性牙髓炎(包括慢性增生性牙髓炎),将75名患者按相似比例随机分配,分别在PTN组或R组接受干预(两次就诊的根管治疗)。采用标准化方案进行分配的操作。参与者(对预备技术不知情)在根管预备就诊后6、12和24小时以及第2天至第7天,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和数字评分法(NRS)对疼痛强度进行评分;记录服用的布洛芬片数量以及咬诊压痛情况。记录预备时间。单因素和多因素统计分析测量自变量对结局的影响。结果:在分配的75名患者中,8名患者(每组4名)失访;PTN组共分析了33名患者,R组分析了34名患者。两组之间术后疼痛频率(p>0.05)和咬诊压痛频率(p>0.05)相似。两组之间的药物摄入量(平均1.31片)和预备时间(约11分钟)相似。结论:ProTaper Next和Reciproc®在根管预备后7天内导致咬诊压痛的风险较小,且导致的自我报告术后疼痛(强度较低)相似。