Suppr超能文献

使用FilmArray脑膜炎/脑炎检测板诊断儿科患者脑膜炎和脑炎的经验。

The experience of using FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel for the diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis in pediatric patients.

作者信息

Lin Grace Yong-En, Lin Chien-Yu, Chi Hsin, Huang Daniel Tsung-Ning, Huang Ching-Ying, Chiu Nan-Chang

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, MacKay Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

Department of Medicine, MacKay Medicine College, New Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022 Dec;55(6 Pt 2):1180-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Central nervous system infections can cause severe complications and even death in children. Early diagnosis of the causative pathogen can guide appropriate treatment and improve outcomes. The BioFire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (FA-ME) is a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay targeting 14 pathogens. We aimed to examine FA-ME performance compared with conventional assays and its effect on antimicrobial usage.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 55 pediatric patients with suspected meningitis or encephalitis and simultaneously performed FA-ME and conventional assays. Sixty-three hospitalized patients with CNS infection before implementing FA-ME were considered controls. We compared the FA-ME results with conventional assays and the empiric antimicrobial usage and hospital stay between the two study groups.

RESULTS

Nine patients (16.4%) tested positive by FA-ME, four were bacterial, and five were viral. Three additional pathogens were detected by conventional assays: Enterococcus faecalis, Leptospira, and herpes simplex virus type 2. In the control group, two bacterial pathogens were detected by CSF culture and four viral pathogens by single PCRs. Compared with the control group, the FA-ME group had a shorter time for pathogen detection, but there were no significant differences in pathogen detection rate, duration of empiric antimicrobial therapy, and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Although no significant difference was found in empiric antimicrobial duration and length of stay between patients tested with FA-ME and conventional assays, FA-ME had the advantage of a shorter detection time and early exclusion of potential causative pathogens. The FA-ME results should be interpreted carefully based on the clinical presentation.

摘要

背景/目的:中枢神经系统感染可导致儿童出现严重并发症甚至死亡。早期诊断致病病原体可指导恰当治疗并改善预后。BioFire® FilmArray® 脑膜炎/脑炎检测板(FA-ME)是一种针对14种病原体的多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法。我们旨在检验FA-ME与传统检测方法相比的性能及其对抗菌药物使用的影响。

方法

我们前瞻性纳入了55例疑似脑膜炎或脑炎的儿科患者,同时进行FA-ME检测和传统检测。63例在实施FA-ME检测之前住院的中枢神经系统感染患者被视为对照组。我们比较了FA-ME检测结果与传统检测结果,以及两个研究组之间的经验性抗菌药物使用情况和住院时间。

结果

9例患者(16.4%)通过FA-ME检测呈阳性,4例为细菌感染,5例为病毒感染。传统检测还额外检测出3种病原体:粪肠球菌、钩端螺旋体和2型单纯疱疹病毒。在对照组中,脑脊液培养检测出2种细菌病原体,单重PCR检测出4种病毒病原体。与对照组相比,FA-ME组的病原体检测时间更短,但在病原体检测率、经验性抗菌治疗持续时间和住院时间方面无显著差异。

结论

虽然使用FA-ME检测的患者与使用传统检测方法的患者在经验性抗菌治疗持续时间和住院时间上没有显著差异,但FA-ME具有检测时间更短和能早期排除潜在致病病原体的优势。应根据临床表现谨慎解读FA-ME检测结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验