Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Cell Death Differ. 2023 Feb;30(2):250-257. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-01058-0. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
One of the tasks of mitochondria is the rule over life and death: when the outer membrane is permeabilized, the release of intermembrane space proteins causes cell death by apoptosis. For a long time, this mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) has been accepted as the famous step from which no cell returns. Recent results have however shown that this quite plainly does not have to be the case. A cell can also undergo only a little MOMP, and it can efficiently repair damage it has incurred in the process. There is no doubt now that such low-scale permeabilization occurs. A major unclarified issue is the biological relevance. Is small-scale mitochondrial permeabilization an accident, a leakiness of the apoptosis apparatus, perhaps during restructuring of the mitochondrial network? Is it attempted suicide, where cell death by apoptosis is the real goal but the stimulus failed to reach the threshold? Or, more boldly, is there a true biological meaning behind the event of the release of low amounts of mitochondrial components? We will here explore this last possibility, which we believe is on one hand appealing, on the other hand plausible and supported by some evidence. Recent data are consistent with the view that sub-lethal signals in the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway can drive inflammation, the first step of an immune reaction. The apoptosis apparatus is almost notoriously easy to trigger. Sub-lethal signals may be even easier to set off. We suggest that the apoptosis apparatus is used in this way to sound the call when the first human cell is infected by a pathogen.
当外膜通透性增加时,跨膜间隙蛋白的释放会通过细胞凋亡导致细胞死亡。长期以来,这种线粒体通透性增加(MOMP)一直被认为是一个著名的“不归点”。然而,最近的研究结果表明,事实并非如此。细胞也可以只经历轻微的 MOMP,并且能够有效地修复在此过程中造成的损伤。毫无疑问,这种低水平的通透性确实存在。一个主要的未解决问题是其生物学相关性。小规模的线粒体通透性增加是偶然发生的,还是凋亡装置的渗漏,可能是在重塑线粒体网络的过程中?是试图自杀,细胞凋亡是真正的目标,但刺激未能达到阈值?或者,更激进地说,少量线粒体成分的释放事件背后是否存在真正的生物学意义?我们将在这里探讨最后一种可能性,我们认为这种可能性一方面很有吸引力,另一方面也有一定的合理性,并得到了一些证据的支持。最近的数据表明,线粒体凋亡途径中的亚致死信号可以驱动炎症,这是免疫反应的第一步。凋亡装置几乎是众所周知的容易被触发。亚致死信号可能更容易引发。我们认为,当第一个人类细胞被病原体感染时,凋亡装置就是以这种方式发出信号的。