Suppr超能文献

区域神经阻滞在全髋关节置换术中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和直接荟萃分析。

The Efficacy and Safety of Regional Nerve Blocks in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Direct Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2022 Oct;37(10):1922-1927.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.035.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regional nerve blocks may be used as a component of a multimodal analgesic protocol to manage postoperative pain after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional nerve blocks after THA in support of the combined clinical practice guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published prior to March 24, 2020 on fascia iliaca, lumbar plexus, and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary THA. All included studies underwent qualitative and quantitative homogeneity testing followed by a systematic review and direct comparison meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the regional nerve blocks.

RESULTS

An initial critical appraisal of 3,382 publications yielded 11 publications representing the best available evidence for an analysis. Fascia iliaca, lumbar plexus, and quadratus lumborum blocks demonstrate the ability to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Among the available comparisons, no difference was noted between a regional nerve block or local periarticular anesthetic infiltration regarding postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

CONCLUSION

Local periarticular anesthetic infiltration should be considered prior to a regional nerve block due to concerns over the safety and cost of regional nerve blocks. If a regional nerve block is used in primary THA, a fascia iliaca block is preferred over other blocks due to the differences in technical demands and risks associated with the alternative regional nerve blocks.

摘要

背景

区域神经阻滞可作为多模式镇痛方案的一部分,用于管理初次全髋关节置换术(THA)后的术后疼痛。我们研究的目的是评估 THA 后区域神经阻滞的疗效和安全性,以支持美国髋关节和膝关节外科医师协会、美国矫形外科医师学会、髋关节协会、膝关节协会和美国区域麻醉和疼痛管理协会的联合临床实践指南。

方法

我们在 2020 年 3 月 24 日之前在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中搜索了关于初次 THA 中股神经、腰丛和竖脊肌阻滞的筋膜髂骨、腰丛和竖脊肌阻滞的研究。所有纳入的研究均进行了定性和定量同质性检验,然后进行系统评价和直接比较荟萃分析,以评估区域神经阻滞的疗效和安全性。

结果

对 3382 篇出版物进行初步严格评价后,有 11 篇出版物提供了最佳可用证据进行分析。股神经、腰丛和竖脊肌阻滞可降低术后疼痛和阿片类药物的使用。在可用的比较中,区域神经阻滞或局部关节周围麻醉浸润在术后疼痛和阿片类药物的使用方面没有差异。

结论

由于对区域神经阻滞的安全性和成本的担忧,应在考虑区域神经阻滞之前考虑局部关节周围麻醉浸润。如果在初次 THA 中使用区域神经阻滞,则由于与替代区域神经阻滞相关的技术要求和风险的差异,股神经阻滞优于其他阻滞。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验