Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, National Institute for Occupational Health (NIOH), Johannesburg, South Africa.
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2023 Jan;20(1):40-53. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2022.2137299. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
In emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, the reuse or reprocessing of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) may be required to mitigate exposure risk. Research gap: Only a few studies evaluated decontamination effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 that are practical for low-resource settings. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a relatively inexpensive ultraviolet germicidal irradiation chamber to decontaminate FFRs contaminated with SARS-CoV-2. A custom-designed UVGI chamber was constructed to determine the ability to decontaminate seven FFR models including N95s, KN95, and FFP2s inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. Vflex was excluded due to design folds/pleats and UVGI shadowing inside the chamber. Structural and functional integrity tolerated by each FFR model on repeated decontamination cycles was assessed. Twenty-seven participants were fit-tested over 30 cycles for each model and passed if the fit factor was ≥100. Of the FFR models included for testing, only the KN95 model failed filtration. The 3M™ 3M 1860 and Halyard™ duckbill 46727 (formerly Kimberly Clark) models performed better on fit testing than other models for both pre-and-post decontaminations. Fewer participants (0.3 and 0.7%, respectively) passed fit testing for Makrite 9500 N95 and Greenline 5200 FFP2 and only two for the KN95 model post decontamination. Fit testing appeared to be more affected by donning & doffing, as some passed with adjustment and repeat fit testing. A ≥ 3 log reduction of SARS-CoV-2 was achieved for worn-in FFRs namely Greenline 5200 FFP2. Conclusion: The study showed that not all FFRs tested could withstand 30 cycles of UVGI decontamination without diminishing filtration efficiency or facial fit. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 log reduction varied across the FFRs, implying that the decontamination efficacy largely depends on the decontamination protocol and selection of FFRs. We demonstrated the effectiveness of a low-cost and scalable decontamination method for SARS-CoV-2 and the effect on fit testing using people instead of manikins. It is recognized that extensive experimental evidence for the reuse of decontaminated FFRs is lacking, and thus this study would be relevant and of interest in crisis-capacity settings, particularly in low-resource facilities.
在 COVID-19 大流行等紧急情况下,可能需要重复使用或重新处理过滤式面罩(FFR),以降低暴露风险。研究空白:只有少数研究评估了针对低资源环境实际可行的针对 SARS-CoV-2 的去污效果。本研究旨在确定一种相对廉价的紫外线杀菌辐照室对污染 SARS-CoV-2 的 FFR 进行消毒的效果。设计了一个定制的 UVGI 室,以确定对七种 FFR 模型(包括 N95、KN95 和 FFP2)进行消毒的能力,这些模型都接种了 SARS-CoV-2。由于设计折叠/褶皱和腔室内的紫外线遮蔽,因此排除了 Vflex。评估了每个 FFR 模型在重复消毒循环中的结构和功能完整性。对于每个模型,有 27 名参与者进行了 30 次以上的 fit 测试,如果 fit 因子≥100,则通过 fit 测试。在进行测试的 FFR 模型中,只有 KN95 模型的过滤失败。3M™3M 1860 和 Halyard™鸭嘴阀 46727(前身为 Kimberly Clark)模型在预消毒和后消毒的 fit 测试中均优于其他模型。对于 Makrite 9500 N95 和 Greenline 5200 FFP2,fit 测试中通过的参与者(分别为 0.3%和 0.7%)较少,只有两个 KN95 模型在消毒后通过。fit 测试似乎更容易受到戴口罩和摘口罩的影响,因为一些人通过调整和重复 fit 测试通过了测试。已磨损的 FFR (即 Greenline 5200 FFP2)实现了 SARS-CoV-2 的≥3 对数减少。结论:该研究表明,并非所有测试的 FFR 都能承受 30 次紫外线消毒循环而不会降低过滤效率或面部贴合度。此外,SARS-CoV-2 的对数减少在不同的 FFR 之间有所不同,这意味着消毒效果在很大程度上取决于消毒方案和 FFR 的选择。我们使用人而不是人体模型证明了一种低成本且可扩展的 SARS-CoV-2 消毒方法的有效性,以及对 fit 测试的影响。人们认识到,缺乏广泛的经消毒的 FFR 重复使用的实验证据,因此,这项研究在危机能力设置中,特别是在低资源设施中,将是相关和有意义的。