Suppr超能文献

多搏动脉血压波形分析与连续热稀释法在心脏术后重症监护病房心输出量评估中的一致性。

Agreement between cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Section on Critical Care Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Apr;37(2):559-565. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00924-z. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

Abstract

We sought to assess agreement of cardiac output estimation between continuous pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) guided thermodilution (CO-CTD) and a novel pulse wave analysis (PWA) method that performs an analysis of multiple beats of the arterial blood pressure waveform (CO-MBA) in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. PAC obtained CO-CTD measurements were compared with CO-MBA measurements from the Argos monitor (Retia Medical; Valhalla, NY, USA), in prospectively enrolled adult cardiac surgical intensive care unit patients. Agreement was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed on data segments identified as arrhythmia, or with low CO (less than 5 L/min). 927 hours of monitoring data from 79 patients was analyzed, of which 26 had arrhythmia. Mean CO-CTD was 5.29 ± 1.14 L/min (bias ± precision), whereas mean CO-MBA was 5.36 ± 1.33 L/min, (4.95 ± 0.80 L/min and 5.04 ± 1.07 L/min in the arrhythmia subgroup). Mean of differences was 0.04 ± 1.04 L/min with an error of 38.2%. In the arrhythmia subgroup, mean of differences was 0.14 ± 0.90 L/min with an error of 35.4%. In the low CO subgroup, mean of differences was 0.26 ± 0.89 L/min with an error of 40.4%. In adult patients after cardiac surgery, including those with low cardiac output and arrhythmia CO-MBA is not interchangeable with the continuous thermodilution method via a PAC, when using a 30% error threshold.

摘要

我们旨在评估连续肺动脉导管(PAC)引导的热稀释法(CO-CTD)和新型脉搏波分析(PWA)方法在心脏手术后患者中估计心输出量的一致性,该方法对动脉血压波形的多个搏动进行分析(CO-MBA)。将 PAC 获得的 CO-CTD 测量值与 Argos 监测仪(Retia Medical;Valhalla,NY,USA)的 CO-MBA 测量值进行比较,该监测仪在前瞻性纳入的成年心脏手术重症监护病房患者中使用。通过 Bland-Altman 分析评估一致性。对被确定为心律失常或心输出量低(低于 5 L/min)的数据段进行亚组分析。对 79 例患者的 927 小时监测数据进行了分析,其中 26 例存在心律失常。CO-CTD 的平均值为 5.29 ± 1.14 L/min(偏倚±精度),而 CO-MBA 的平均值为 5.36 ± 1.33 L/min(心律失常亚组为 4.95 ± 0.80 L/min 和 5.04 ± 1.07 L/min)。差异平均值为 0.04 ± 1.04 L/min,误差为 38.2%。在心律失常亚组中,差异平均值为 0.14 ± 0.90 L/min,误差为 35.4%。在心输出量低亚组中,差异平均值为 0.26 ± 0.89 L/min,误差为 40.4%。在心脏手术后的成年患者中,包括那些存在低心输出量和心律失常的患者,当使用 30%的误差阈值时,CO-MBA 与连续热稀释法通过 PAC 不可互换。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca0/10068656/cb6a4fea5484/10877_2022_924_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验