Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术中单次注射与持续股内收肌管阻滞的镇痛效果:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Analgesic benefits of single-shot versus continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

作者信息

Hussain Nasir, Brull Richard, Zhou Steven, Schroell Robert, McCartney Colin, Sawyer Tamara, Abdallah Faraj W

机构信息

Anesthesiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Feb;48(2):49-60. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103756. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adductor canal block (ACB) can provide important analgesic benefits following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however, the extent to which these benefits can be enhanced or prolonged by a continuous catheter-based infusion compared with a single-shot injection of local anesthetic is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42021292738) review sought to compare the analgesic effectiveness of single shot to continuous ACB following TKA.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We sought randomized trials from the US National Library of Medicine database (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to November 1, 2021, that compared single-shot to continuous ACB in adult patients undergoing TKA. The primary outcomes were (1) area under the curve (AUC) pain severity at rest and (2) cumulative opioid (oral morphine equivalent) consumption during the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain severity scores up to 48 hours, cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours, functional recovery, opioid-related side effects, and block-related complications. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Statistical pooling was conducted using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects. No funding was obtained for this review.

FINDINGS

Eleven trials (1185 patients) were included. No differences were observed in rest pain severity (AUC) or cumulative opioid consumption up to 48 hours postoperatively. In addition, no differences were observed in individual postoperative rest pain scores in the recovery room and at 12 and 24 hours, or in cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours, functional recovery, and opioid-related side effects. Finally, fewer block-related complications were observed with single-shot ACB, with an OR (95% CI) of 0.24 (0.14 to 0.41) (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that continuous catheter-based ACB does not enhance or prolong the analgesic benefits when compared with single-shot ACB for TKA over the first 48 hours postoperatively. Overall, the results of our meta-analysis do not support the routine use of continuous ACB for postoperative analgesia after TKA.

摘要

背景

收肌管阻滞(ACB)在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后可提供重要的镇痛效果,然而,与单次注射局部麻醉剂相比,基于导管持续输注能否增强或延长这些效果尚不清楚。

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPERO:CRD42021292738)旨在比较TKA后单次注射与持续ACB的镇痛效果。

证据回顾

我们检索了美国国立医学图书馆数据库(MEDLINE)、医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和Cochrane系统评价数据库,从建库至2021年11月1日,比较TKA成年患者单次注射与持续ACB的随机试验。主要结局为:(1)静息时疼痛严重程度的曲线下面积(AUC);(2)术后48小时内累积阿片类药物(口服吗啡当量)消耗量。次要结局包括术后48小时内的疼痛严重程度评分、24小时时的累积阿片类药物消耗量、功能恢复、阿片类药物相关副作用以及阻滞相关并发症。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。使用Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman随机效应方法进行统计合并。本评价未获得资金支持。

结果

纳入11项试验(1185例患者)。术后48小时内静息疼痛严重程度(AUC)或累积阿片类药物消耗量无差异。此外,在恢复室、术后12小时和24小时的个体术后静息疼痛评分、24小时时的累积阿片类药物消耗量、功能恢复以及阿片类药物相关副作用方面均未观察到差异。最后,单次注射ACB的阻滞相关并发症较少,比值比(OR,95%CI)为0.24(0.14至0.41)(p = 0.002)。

结论

我们的结果表明,与单次注射ACB相比,TKA术后48小时内基于导管持续输注ACB并不能增强或延长镇痛效果。总体而言,我们的荟萃分析结果不支持TKA术后常规使用持续ACB进行术后镇痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验