Szklener Katarzyna, Mazurek Marek, Wieteska Małgorzata, Wacławska Monika, Bilski Mateusz, Mańdziuk Sławomir
Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 8 Jaczewski Street, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 31;14(21):5377. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215377.
Glioblastoma is the most common histologic type of all gliomas and contributes to 57.3% of all cases. Despite the standard management based on surgical resection and radiotherapy, it is related to poor outcome, with a 5-year relative survival rate below 6.9%. In order to improve the overall outcome for patients, the new therapeutic strategies are needed. Herein, we describe the current state of knowledge on novel targeted therapies in glioblastoma. Based on recent studies, we compared treatment efficacy measured by overall survival and progression-free survival in patients treated with selected potential antitumor drugs. The results of the application of the analyzed inhibitors are highly variable despite the encouraging conclusions of previous preclinical studies. This paper focused on drugs that target major glioblastoma kinases. As far, the results of some inhibitors are favorable. Vemurafenib demonstrated a long-term efficacy in clinical trials while the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib improves PFS compared with both vemurafenib and dabrafenib alone. There is no evidence that any MEK inhibitor is effective in monotherapy. According to the current state of knowledge, and MEK inhibition are more advantageous than inhibitor monotherapy. Moreover, mTOR inhibitors (especially paxalisib) may be considered a particularly important group. Everolimus demonstrated a partial response in a significant proportion of patients when combined with bevacizumab, however its actual role in the treatment is unclear. Neither nintedanib nor pemigatinib were efficient in treatment of GBM. Among the anti-VEGF drugs, bevacizumab monotherapy was a well-tolerated option, significantly associated with anti-GBM activity in patients with recurrent GBM. The efficacy of aflibercept and pazopanib in monotherapy has not been demonstrated. Apatinib has been proven to be effective and tolerable by a single clinical trial, but more research is needed. Lenvatinib is under trial. Finally, promising results from a study with regorafenib may be confirmed by the ongoing randomized AGILE trial. The studies conducted so far have provided a relatively wide range of drugs, which are at least well tolerated and demonstrated some efficacy in the randomized clinical trials. The comprehensive understanding of the molecular biology of gliomas promises to further improve the treatment outcomes of patients.
胶质母细胞瘤是所有神经胶质瘤中最常见的组织学类型,占所有病例的57.3%。尽管基于手术切除和放疗的标准治疗方法存在,但它与不良预后相关,5年相对生存率低于6.9%。为了改善患者的总体预后,需要新的治疗策略。在此,我们描述了胶质母细胞瘤新型靶向治疗的当前知识状态。基于最近的研究,我们比较了使用选定的潜在抗肿瘤药物治疗的患者的总生存期和无进展生存期所衡量的治疗效果。尽管先前的临床前研究得出了令人鼓舞的结论,但所分析抑制剂的应用结果差异很大。本文重点关注靶向主要胶质母细胞瘤激酶的药物。到目前为止,一些抑制剂的结果是有利的。维莫非尼在临床试验中显示出长期疗效,而达拉非尼和曲美替尼的联合使用与单独使用维莫非尼和达拉非尼相比,可改善无进展生存期。没有证据表明任何MEK抑制剂单药治疗有效。根据目前的知识状态,MEK抑制比抑制剂单药治疗更具优势。此外,mTOR抑制剂(尤其是帕唑帕尼)可能被认为是一个特别重要的组。依维莫司与贝伐单抗联合使用时,在相当比例的患者中显示出部分缓解,但其在治疗中的实际作用尚不清楚。尼达尼布和培米替尼在胶质母细胞瘤治疗中均无效。在抗VEGF药物中,贝伐单抗单药治疗是一种耐受性良好的选择,与复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的抗胶质母细胞瘤活性显著相关。阿柏西普和帕唑帕尼单药治疗的疗效尚未得到证实。一项临床试验已证明阿帕替尼有效且耐受性良好,但还需要更多研究。乐伐替尼正在进行试验。最后,瑞戈非尼研究的有前景的结果可能会被正在进行的随机AGILE试验所证实。迄今为止进行的研究提供了相对广泛的药物,这些药物至少耐受性良好,并在随机临床试验中显示出一定疗效。对神经胶质瘤分子生物学的全面理解有望进一步改善患者的治疗结果。