Ayala Rosa, Carreño-Tarragona Gonzalo, Barragán Eva, Boluda Blanca, Larráyoz María J, Chillón María Carmen, Carrillo-Cruz Estrella, Bilbao Cristina, Sánchez-García Joaquín, Bernal Teresa, Martinez-Cuadron David, Gil Cristina, Serrano Josefina, Rodriguez-Medina Carlos, Bergua Juan, Pérez-Simón José A, Calbacho María, Alonso-Domínguez Juan M, Labrador Jorge, Tormo Mar, Amigo Maria Luz, Herrera-Puente Pilar, Rapado Inmaculada, Sargas Claudia, Vazquez Iria, Calasanz María J, Gomez-Casares Teresa, García-Sanz Ramón, Sanz Miguel A, Martínez-López Joaquín, Montesinos Pau
Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, i+12, CNIO, CIBERONC, Complutense University, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Molecular Biology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic-IIS La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;14(23):5799. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235799.
FLT3−ITD results in a poor prognosis in terms of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the prognostic usefulness of the allelic ratio (AR) to select post-remission therapy remains controversial. Our study focuses on the prognostic impact of FLT3−ITD and its ratio in a series of 2901 adult patients treated intensively in the pre-FLT3 inhibitor era and reported in the PETHEMA registry. A total of 579 of these patients (20%) harbored FLT3−ITD mutations. In multivariate analyses, patients with an FLT3−ITD allele ratio (AR) of >0.5 showed a lower complete remission (CR rate) and OS (HR 1.47, p = 0.009), while AR > 0.8 was associated with poorer RFS (HR 2.1; p < 0.001). Among NPM1/FLT3−ITD-mutated patients, median OS gradually decreased according to FLT3−ITD status and ratio (34.3 months FLT3−ITD-negative, 25.3 months up to 0.25, 14.5 months up to 0.5, and 10 months ≥ 0.5, p < 0.001). Post-remission allogeneic transplant (allo-HSCT) resulted in better OS and RFS as compared to auto-HSCT in NPM1/FLT3−ITD-mutated AML regardless of pre-established AR cutoff (≤0.5 vs. >0.5). Using the maximally selected log-rank statistics, we established an optimal cutoff of FLT3−ITD AR of 0.44 for OS, and 0.8 for RFS. We analyzed the OS and RFS according to FLT3−ITD status in all patients, and we found that the group of FLT3−ITD-positive patients with AR < 0.44 had similar 5-year OS after allo-HSCT or auto-HSCT (52% and 41%, respectively, p = 0.86), but worse RFS after auto-HSCT (p = 0.01). Among patients with FLT3−ITD AR > 0.44, allo-HSCT was superior to auto-HSCT in terms of OS and RFS. This study provides more evidence for a better characterization of patients with AML harboring FLT3−ITD mutations.
在急性髓系白血病(AML)中,FLT3-ITD在总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)方面预后较差。然而,等位基因比率(AR)用于选择缓解后治疗的预后价值仍存在争议。我们的研究聚焦于FLT3-ITD及其比率在2901例在FLT3抑制剂时代之前接受强化治疗且在PETHEMA登记处报告的成年患者中的预后影响。这些患者中共有579例(20%)携带FLT3-ITD突变。在多变量分析中,FLT3-ITD等位基因比率(AR)>0.5的患者完全缓解率(CR率)和OS较低(风险比[HR] 1.47,p = 0.009),而AR > 0.8与较差的RFS相关(HR 2.1;p < 0.001)。在NPM1/FLT3-ITD突变的患者中,根据FLT3-ITD状态和比率,中位OS逐渐降低(FLT3-ITD阴性为34.3个月,AR高达0.25为25.3个月,AR高达0.5为14.5个月,AR≥0.5为10个月,p < 0.001)。在NPM1/FLT3-ITD突变的AML中,无论预先设定的AR临界值(≤0.5 vs. >0.5)如何,缓解后异基因移植(allo-HSCT)与自体HSCT相比,OS和RFS更佳。使用最大选择对数秩统计,我们确定OS的FLT3-ITD AR最佳临界值为0.44,RFS为0.8。我们根据所有患者的FLT3-ITD状态分析了OS和RFS,发现AR < 0.44的FLT3-ITD阳性患者在allo-HSCT或自体HSCT后的5年OS相似(分别为52%和41%,p = 0.86),但自体HSCT后的RFS较差(p = 0.01)。在FLT3-ITD AR > 0.44的患者中,allo-HSCT在OS和RFS方面优于自体HSCT。本研究为更好地描述携带FLT3-ITD突变的AML患者提供了更多证据。