Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California.
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
J Adolesc Health. 2023 Apr;72(4):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.10.028. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
Early life adversity (ELA) is associated with sexual risk, but ELA dimensions-and potential mechanisms-have been less examined. We evaluated associations between threat and deprivation-two key ELA dimensions-and sexual behaviors in adolescents. Secondary analyses investigated age at menarche as a mechanism linking ELA with sexual outcomes in girls. We predicted associations between threat and sexual behaviors, with younger age at menarche as a pathway.
Data were from the National Comorbidity Survey, Adolescent Supplement. Adolescents and caregivers reported on youths' ELA experiences, which were categorized as threat- or deprivation-related. Adolescents reported if they engaged in sex (N = 9,937) and on specific sexual risk indicators, including age at first sex, number of past-year sexual partners, and condom use consistency ("always" vs. "not always" used). Girls reported age at menarche.
Threat (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-1.92]) and deprivation (OR = 1.51 [95% CI, 1.24-1.83]) were each linked with engagement in sex, ps<.05. Threat-related experiences were associated with multiple sexual risk markers, even when accounting for deprivation: earlier age at first sex (b = -0.20 [95% CI, -0.27 to 0.13]), greater number of partners (b = 0.17 [95% CI, 0.10-0.25]), and inconsistent condom use (OR = 0.72 [95% CI, 0.64-0.80]), ps <.001. Deprivation was not associated with sexual risk when adjusting for threat. We observed no significant indirect effects through age at menarche.
Although threat and deprivation were related to engagement in sexual activity, threat-related experiences were uniquely associated with sexual risk. Screening for threat-related ELA may identify adolescents at-risk for poor sexual health.
早期生活逆境(ELA)与性风险相关,但 ELA 的维度及其潜在机制尚未得到充分研究。我们评估了威胁和剥夺这两个关键 ELA 维度与青少年性行为之间的关系。二次分析研究了初潮年龄作为将 ELA 与女孩性结果联系起来的机制。我们预测了威胁与性行为之间的关联,以及初潮年龄作为一个途径。
数据来自国家共病调查,青少年补充调查。青少年及其照顾者报告了年轻人的 ELA 经历,这些经历被归类为与威胁或剥夺相关。青少年报告了他们是否发生过性行为(N=9937)以及特定的性风险指标,包括首次性行为的年龄、过去一年的性伴侣数量和 condom 使用一致性(“总是”与“不总是”使用)。女孩报告了初潮年龄。
威胁(优势比[OR]=1.76[95%置信区间[CI],1.62-1.92])和剥夺(OR=1.51[95% CI,1.24-1.83])都与性行为的参与有关,p<.05。威胁相关的经历与多种性风险标志物有关,即使考虑到剥夺:首次性行为的年龄较早(b=-0.20[95% CI,-0.27 至 0.13])、伴侣数量更多(b=0.17[95% CI,0.10-0.25])和 condom 使用不一致(OR=0.72[95% CI,0.64-0.80]),p<.001。在调整威胁时,剥夺与性风险无关。我们没有观察到通过初潮年龄的显著间接影响。
尽管威胁和剥夺与参与性行为有关,但威胁相关的经历与性风险有独特的关系。对威胁相关 ELA 的筛查可能会识别出性健康状况不佳的青少年。