Suppr超能文献

社区卫生工作者和健康促进员对一门研究最佳实践课程的看法:一项焦点小组研究

Community health workers and promotoras' perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study.

作者信息

Varma Deepthi S, Samuels Elias, Piatt Gretchen, Watkins Daphne C, Spiroff Meghan, Cottler Linda B, Gaxiola Sergio Aguilar, Murphy Susan L

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Michigan Institute of Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Sep 26;6(1):e137. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.464. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Community Health Workers and Promotoras (CHW/Ps) are valued for their role in helping to engage community members in research. CHW/Ps have traditionally received variable training in research fundamentals, including importance and promotion of research rigor to establish consistency in the methods used over time. Research best practices training exists for research professionals, but no standard training is provided as part of the CHW/P job role. To develop this CHW/P research best practices training, our team engaged English- and Spanish-speaking CHW/Ps to watch an early version of an online module and to examine perceptions of the relevance of such a training and optimal delivery methods.

METHODS

Six virtual focus group discussions were conducted (three in English and three in Spanish) across different US geographic regions with currently employed CHW/Ps.

RESULTS

Forty CHW/Ps participated (95% female, mean age 44 years, 58% identifying as Hispanic/Latino). Four themes emerged: relevance of training, benefits of providing a certificate of completion, flexible training delivery modalities, and peer-led training.

DISCUSSION

With participation from representatives of the intended learner group of CHW/Ps, our team found that CHW/Ps valued learning about research best practices. They perceived culturally- and linguistically appropriate health research training to be highly relevant to their role, particularly for communicating key information to community members about their participation in health research. Additionally, participants provided input on effective dissemination of the training including the benefit of having proof of course completion, involvement of peer trainers, and value of providing the option to participate in online training.

摘要

引言

社区卫生工作者和健康促进者(CHW/Ps)在帮助社区成员参与研究方面发挥的作用受到重视。传统上,CHW/Ps在研究基础知识方面接受的培训参差不齐,包括研究严谨性的重要性及推广,以确保随着时间推移所使用方法的一致性。针对研究专业人员有研究最佳实践培训,但作为CHW/P工作角色的一部分,没有提供标准培训。为开发这种CHW/P研究最佳实践培训,我们的团队让说英语和西班牙语的CHW/Ps观看在线模块的早期版本,并考察他们对这种培训相关性及最佳交付方式的看法。

方法

在美国不同地理区域与在职CHW/Ps进行了六次虚拟焦点小组讨论(三次用英语,三次用西班牙语)。

结果

40名CHW/Ps参与(95%为女性,平均年龄44岁,58%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔)。出现了四个主题:培训的相关性、提供结业证书的益处、灵活的培训交付方式以及同伴主导的培训。

讨论

在CHW/Ps目标学习群体代表的参与下,我们的团队发现CHW/Ps重视学习研究最佳实践。他们认为文化和语言上合适的健康研究培训与他们的角色高度相关,特别是在向社区成员传达有关其参与健康研究的关键信息方面。此外,参与者就培训的有效传播提供了意见,包括获得课程结业证明的益处、同伴培训师的参与以及提供在线培训选项的价值。

相似文献

1
Community health workers and promotoras' perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Sep 26;6(1):e137. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.464. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of an online research best practices training for community health workers and promotoras.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Sep 5;7(1):e195. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.624. eCollection 2023.
3
Evaluation of a peer-led research best practices training for community health workers and promotoras.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Sep 16;8(1):e117. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.593. eCollection 2024.
5
A Comprehensive and Modality Diverse Cervical Spine and Back Musculoskeletal Physical Exam Curriculum for Medical Students.
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 31;10(3):SG1-SG8. doi: 10.21980/J8RQ0N. eCollection 2025 Jul.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Implementation of link workers in primary care: Synopsis of findings from a realist evaluation.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(27):1-30. doi: 10.3310/KHGT9993.
8
The training for community health workers: a mixed-methods study.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 18;13:1610413. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1610413. eCollection 2025.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluation of a peer-led research best practices training for community health workers and promotoras.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Sep 16;8(1):e117. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.593. eCollection 2024.
4
Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Experiences During, Awareness of, and Attitudes Toward Research for People With Parkinson Disease.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Aug;14(4):e200304. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200304. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
Evaluation of an online research best practices training for community health workers and promotoras.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Sep 5;7(1):e195. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.624. eCollection 2023.
7
Training Latinx Community Health Workers as Clinical Research and Health Care System Navigators.
Am J Public Health. 2023 Nov;113(11):1157-1159. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307418. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
9
Laying the groundwork to make diversity, equity, and inclusion front and center in clinical and translational research.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Apr 24;7(1):e95. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.524. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 6. Recruitment, training, and continuing education.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Oct 12;19(Suppl 3):113. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00757-3.
3
Community Health Worker Training Curricula and Intervention Outcomes in African American and Latinx Communities: A Systematic Review.
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Aug;48(4):516-531. doi: 10.1177/1090198120959326. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
Training Needs of Community Health Workers Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic in Texas: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 14;9:689946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.689946. eCollection 2021.
5
Addressing inequities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality: research and policy recommendations.
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Aug 7;10(3):516-519. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa055.
6
Prioritising the role of community health workers in the COVID-19 response.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002550.
7
COVID-19 Crisis Creates Opportunities for Community-Centered Population Health: Community Health Workers at the Center.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2020 Jul/Sep;43(3):184-190. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000337.
8
COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US.
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1243-1244. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30893-X.
9
From community engagement, to community-engaged research, to broadly engaged team science.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr 12;1(1):5-6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.1. eCollection 2017 Feb.
10
Mental Health Interventions with Community Health Workers in the United States: A Systematic Review.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(1):159-180. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验