School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.
Institution of Healthy Jiangsu Development, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jan 3;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01813-2.
Understanding whether the type of primary caregiver and end-of-life (EOL) care location are associated with EOL medical expenditures is crucial to inform global debates on policies for efficient and effective EOL care. This study aims to assess trends in the type of primary caregiver and place of death stratified by rural‒urban status among the oldest-old population from 1998-2018 in China. A secondary objective is to determine the associations between rurality, the type of primary caregiver, place of death and EOL medical expenditures. METHODS: A total of 20,149 deaths of people aged 80 years or older were derived from the Chinese Longitudinal Health Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Cochran-Armitage tests and Cuzick's tests were used to test trends in the type of primary caregiver and place of death over time, respectively. Tobit models were used to estimate the marginal associations of rurality, type of primary caregiver, and place of death with EOL medical expenditures because CLHLS sets 100,000 Chinese yuan (approximately US$15,286) as the upper limit of the outcome variable. RESULTS: Of the 20,149 oldest-old people, the median age at death was 97 years old, 12,490 (weighted, 58.6%, hereafter) were female, and 8,235 lived in urban areas. From 1998-2018, the prevalence of informal caregivers significantly increased from 94.3% to 96.2%, and home death significantly increased from 86.0% to 89.5%. The proportion of people receiving help from informal caregivers significantly increased in urban decedents (16.5%) but decreased in rural decedents (-4.0%), while home death rates significantly increased among both urban (15.3%) and rural (1.8%) decedents. In the adjusted models, rural decedents spent less than urban decedents did (marginal difference [95% CI]: $-229 [$-378, $-80]). Those who died in hospitals spent more than those who died at home ($798 [$518, $1077]). No difference in medical expenditures by type of primary caregiver was observed.
Over the past two decades, the increases in informal caregiver utilization and home deaths were unequal, leading to substantially higher EOL medical expenditures among urban decedents and deceased individuals who died at hospitals than among their counterparts who lived in rural areas and died at home.
了解主要照顾者的类型和临终关怀地点是否与临终医疗支出相关,对于为有效和高效的临终关怀政策提供信息至关重要。本研究旨在评估 1998 年至 2018 年期间,中国最年长人群中按城乡状况划分的主要照顾者类型和死亡地点的趋势。次要目标是确定农村地区、主要照顾者类型、死亡地点与临终医疗支出之间的关系。
本研究共纳入 20149 名 80 岁及以上死亡的老年人,这些数据来源于中国健康长寿纵向研究(CLHLS)。采用 Cochran-Armitage 检验和 Cuzick 检验分别检验主要照顾者类型和死亡地点随时间的变化趋势。由于 CLHLS 将 100,000 元人民币(约合 15,286 美元)作为因变量的上限,因此本研究采用 Tobit 模型来估计农村地区、主要照顾者类型和死亡地点与临终医疗支出的边际关联。
在这 20149 名最年长的人群中,死亡时的中位年龄为 97 岁,12490 人(加权后占 58.6%)为女性,8235 人居住在城市地区。1998 年至 2018 年期间,非正规照顾者的比例从 94.3%显著上升至 96.2%,在家中死亡的比例从 86.0%显著上升至 89.5%。城市死亡者中接受非正规照顾者帮助的比例显著增加(16.5%),而农村死亡者中这一比例下降(-4.0%),与此同时,城市(15.3%)和农村(1.8%)死亡者的在家中死亡比例均显著增加。在调整后的模型中,农村死亡者的临终医疗支出低于城市死亡者(边际差异[95%CI]:-229 美元[-378,-80])。在医院死亡者的临终医疗支出高于在家中死亡者(798 美元[518,1077])。主要照顾者类型与临终医疗支出无差异。
在过去的二十年中,非正规照顾者的使用增加和在家中死亡的比例增加并不均衡,这导致城市死亡者和在医院死亡者的临终医疗支出显著高于在农村地区生活和在家中死亡者。