Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, 55-59 Gordon Square, London, WC1H 0NU, UK.
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, Melbourne House, 44-46 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4LL, UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;59(3):417-429. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02424-0. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
Mental health inequalities across social identities/positions during the COVID-19 pandemic have been mostly reported independently from each other or in a limited way (e.g., at the intersection between age and sex or gender). We aim to provide an inclusive socio-demographic mapping of different mental health measures in the population using quantitative methods that are consistent with an intersectional perspective.
Data included 8,588 participants from two British cohorts (born in 1990 and 2000-2002, respectively), collected in February/March 2021 (during the third UK nationwide lockdown). Measures of anxiety and depressive symptomatology, loneliness, and life satisfaction were analysed using Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) models.
We found evidence of large mental health inequalities across intersectional strata. Large proportions of those inequalities were accounted for by the additive effects of the variables used to define the intersections, with some of the largest gaps associated with sexual orientation (with sexual minority groups showing substantially worse outcomes). Additional inequalities were found by cohort/generation, birth sex, racial/ethnic groups, and socioeconomic position. Intersectional effects were observed mostly in intersections defined by combinations of privileged and marginalised social identities/positions (e.g., lower-than-expected life satisfaction in South Asian men in their thirties from a sexual minority and a disadvantaged childhood social class).
We found substantial inequalities largely cutting across intersectional strata defined by multiple co-constituting social identities/positions. The large gaps found by sexual orientation extend the existing evidence that sexual minority groups were disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Study implications and limitations are discussed.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,社会身份/地位之间的心理健康不平等现象大多是相互独立或以有限的方式报告的(例如,年龄和性别或性别之间的交叉)。我们旨在使用符合交叉视角的定量方法,对人口中不同心理健康措施进行包容性的社会人口学映射。
数据包括来自两个英国队列的 8588 名参与者(分别出生于 1990 年和 2000-2002 年),于 2021 年 2 月/3 月(在第三次英国全国封锁期间)收集。使用个体异质性和判别准确性的多层次分析(MAIHDA)模型分析焦虑和抑郁症状、孤独感和生活满意度的措施。
我们发现交叉层之间存在大量心理健康不平等的证据。这些不平等的很大一部分是由用于定义交叉点的变量的加性效应解释的,其中一些最大的差距与性取向有关(少数性群体的结果明显较差)。还发现了队列/代际、出生性别、种族/族裔群体和社会经济地位方面的不平等。交叉效应主要出现在由特权和边缘化社会身份/地位组合定义的交叉点中(例如,来自少数性群体和不利童年社会阶层的三十多岁南亚男性的生活满意度低于预期)。
我们发现了大量的不平等现象,这些不平等现象主要涉及由多个共同构成的社会身份/地位定义的交叉层。性取向发现的巨大差距扩大了现有证据,表明少数性群体受大流行的影响不成比例。讨论了研究意义和局限性。