Suppr超能文献

胰岛自身抗体标准化项目:2018 年和 2020 年研讨会中胰岛素自身抗体检测性能的实验室间比较。

Islet Autoantibody Standardization Program: interlaboratory comparison of insulin autoantibody assay performance in 2018 and 2020 workshops.

机构信息

San Raffaele Diabetes Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Department of Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2023 May;66(5):897-912. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-05877-9. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The Islet Autoantibody Standardization Program (IASP) aims to improve the performance of immunoassays measuring autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes and the concordance of results across laboratories. IASP organises international workshops distributing anonymised serum samples to participating laboratories and centralises the collection and analysis of results. In this report, we describe the results of assays measuring IAA submitted to the IASP 2018 and 2020 workshops.

METHODS

The IASP distributed uniquely coded sera from individuals with new-onset type 1 diabetes, multiple islet autoantibody-positive individuals, and diabetes-free blood donors in both 2018 and 2020. Serial dilutions of the anti-insulin mouse monoclonal antibody HUI-018 were also included. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), partial ROC-AUC at 95% specificity (pAUC95) and concordance of qualitative/quantitative results were compared across assays.

RESULTS

Results from 45 IAA assays of seven different formats and from 37 IAA assays of six different formats were submitted to the IASP in 2018 and 2020, respectively. The median ROC-AUC was 0.736 (IQR 0.617-0.803) and 0.790 (IQR 0.730-0.836), while the median pAUC95 was 0.016 (IQR 0.004-0.021) and 0.023 (IQR 0.014-0.026) in the 2018 and 2020 workshops, respectively. Assays largely differed in AUC (IASP 2018 range 0.232-0.874; IASP 2020 range 0.379-0.924) and pAUC95 (IASP 2018 and IASP 2020 range 0-0.032).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Assay formats submitted to this study showed heterogeneous performance. Despite the high variability across laboratories, the in-house radiobinding assay (RBA) remains the gold standard for IAA measurement. However, novel non-radioactive IAA immunoassays showed a good performance and, if further improved, might be considered valid alternatives to RBAs.

摘要

目的/假设:胰岛自身抗体标准化计划(IASP)旨在提高用于 1 型糖尿病的自身抗体免疫测定的性能,并提高实验室之间结果的一致性。IASP 组织国际研讨会,向参与实验室分发匿名血清样本,并集中收集和分析结果。在本报告中,我们描述了提交给 IASP 2018 年和 2020 年研讨会的测量 IAA 的测定结果。

方法

IASP 在 2018 年和 2020 年分别分发了来自新诊断为 1 型糖尿病的个体、多种胰岛自身抗体阳性个体和无糖尿病献血者的独特编码血清,还包括抗胰岛素小鼠单克隆抗体 HUI-018 的系列稀释液。比较了不同测定方法的灵敏度、特异性、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)、95%特异性时的部分 ROC-AUC(pAUC95)和定性/定量结果的一致性。

结果

2018 年和 2020 年,分别有 45 种和 37 种不同格式的 IAA 测定提交给 IASP。中位数 ROC-AUC 分别为 0.736(IQR 0.617-0.803)和 0.790(IQR 0.730-0.836),而 pAUC95 的中位数分别为 0.016(IQR 0.004-0.021)和 0.023(IQR 0.014-0.026)。测定方法在 AUC(IASP 2018 范围 0.232-0.874;IASP 2020 范围 0.379-0.924)和 pAUC95(IASP 2018 和 IASP 2020 范围 0-0.032)方面差异很大。

结论/解释:本研究提交的测定方法表现出异质性。尽管实验室之间的变异很大,但内部放射结合测定(RBA)仍然是 IAA 测量的金标准。然而,新型非放射性 IAA 免疫测定具有良好的性能,如果进一步改进,可能被视为 RBA 的有效替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8771/10036445/026e4b020ac4/125_2023_5877_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验