Kakourou Georgia, Mamas Thalia, Vrettou Christina, Traeger-Synodinos Joanne
Laboratory of Medical Genetics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, St. Sophia's Children's Hospital, 11527, Athens, Greece.
Curr Genomics. 2022 Nov 18;23(5):337-352. doi: 10.2174/1389202923666220927111158.
Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) aims to reduce the chance of an affected pregnancy or improve success in an assisted reproduction cycle. Since the first established pregnancies in 1990, methodological approaches have greatly evolved, combined with significant advances in the embryological laboratory. The application of preimplantation testing has expanded, while the accuracy and reliability of monogenic and chromosomal analysis have improved. The procedure traditionally employs an invasive approach to assess the nucleic acid content of embryos. All biopsy procedures require high technical skill, and costly equipment, and may impact both the accuracy of genetic testing and embryo viability. To overcome these limitations, many researchers have focused on the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) at the preimplantation stage, sampled either from the blastocoel or embryo culture media, to determine the genetic status of the embryo non-invasively. Studies have assessed the origin of cfDNA and its application in non-invasive testing for monogenic disease and chromosomal aneuploidies. Herein, we discuss the state-of-the-art for modern non-invasive embryonic genetic material assessment in the context of PGT. The results are difficult to integrate due to numerous methodological differences between the studies, while further work is required to assess the suitability of cfDNA analysis for clinical application.
植入前基因检测(PGT)旨在降低受影响妊娠的几率或提高辅助生殖周期的成功率。自1990年首次成功妊娠以来,随着胚胎学实验室的重大进展,方法学也有了很大发展。植入前检测的应用范围不断扩大,单基因和染色体分析的准确性和可靠性也有所提高。该程序传统上采用侵入性方法来评估胚胎的核酸含量。所有活检程序都需要高技术技能和昂贵的设备,并且可能影响基因检测的准确性和胚胎活力。为了克服这些限制,许多研究人员专注于在植入前阶段分析从囊胚腔或胚胎培养基中采样的游离DNA(cfDNA),以无创地确定胚胎的基因状态。研究已经评估了cfDNA的来源及其在单基因疾病和染色体非整倍体无创检测中的应用。在此,我们在PGT的背景下讨论现代无创胚胎基因材料评估的最新进展。由于研究之间存在众多方法学差异,结果难以整合,同时还需要进一步的工作来评估cfDNA分析在临床应用中的适用性。