Suppr超能文献

植入前胚胎基因检测的非侵入性方法最新进展

An Update on Non-invasive Approaches for Genetic Testing of the Preimplantation Embryo.

作者信息

Kakourou Georgia, Mamas Thalia, Vrettou Christina, Traeger-Synodinos Joanne

机构信息

Laboratory of Medical Genetics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, St. Sophia's Children's Hospital, 11527, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Curr Genomics. 2022 Nov 18;23(5):337-352. doi: 10.2174/1389202923666220927111158.

Abstract

Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) aims to reduce the chance of an affected pregnancy or improve success in an assisted reproduction cycle. Since the first established pregnancies in 1990, methodological approaches have greatly evolved, combined with significant advances in the embryological laboratory. The application of preimplantation testing has expanded, while the accuracy and reliability of monogenic and chromosomal analysis have improved. The procedure traditionally employs an invasive approach to assess the nucleic acid content of embryos. All biopsy procedures require high technical skill, and costly equipment, and may impact both the accuracy of genetic testing and embryo viability. To overcome these limitations, many researchers have focused on the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) at the preimplantation stage, sampled either from the blastocoel or embryo culture media, to determine the genetic status of the embryo non-invasively. Studies have assessed the origin of cfDNA and its application in non-invasive testing for monogenic disease and chromosomal aneuploidies. Herein, we discuss the state-of-the-art for modern non-invasive embryonic genetic material assessment in the context of PGT. The results are difficult to integrate due to numerous methodological differences between the studies, while further work is required to assess the suitability of cfDNA analysis for clinical application.

摘要

植入前基因检测(PGT)旨在降低受影响妊娠的几率或提高辅助生殖周期的成功率。自1990年首次成功妊娠以来,随着胚胎学实验室的重大进展,方法学也有了很大发展。植入前检测的应用范围不断扩大,单基因和染色体分析的准确性和可靠性也有所提高。该程序传统上采用侵入性方法来评估胚胎的核酸含量。所有活检程序都需要高技术技能和昂贵的设备,并且可能影响基因检测的准确性和胚胎活力。为了克服这些限制,许多研究人员专注于在植入前阶段分析从囊胚腔或胚胎培养基中采样的游离DNA(cfDNA),以无创地确定胚胎的基因状态。研究已经评估了cfDNA的来源及其在单基因疾病和染色体非整倍体无创检测中的应用。在此,我们在PGT的背景下讨论现代无创胚胎基因材料评估的最新进展。由于研究之间存在众多方法学差异,结果难以整合,同时还需要进一步的工作来评估cfDNA分析在临床应用中的适用性。

相似文献

1
An Update on Non-invasive Approaches for Genetic Testing of the Preimplantation Embryo.
Curr Genomics. 2022 Nov 18;23(5):337-352. doi: 10.2174/1389202923666220927111158.
2
Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics?
Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):16-42. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz033.
3
Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for putative mosaic blastocysts: a pilot study.
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jun 18;36(7):2020-2034. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab080.
6
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):CD005291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3.
8
Is cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture medium an alternative to embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing? A systematic review.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jun;40(6):779-796. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
9
Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproductive technology: current state and future perspectives.
J Genet Genomics. 2020 Dec 20;47(12):723-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
10
Minimally invasive preimplantation genetic testing using blastocyst culture medium.
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jul 8;34(7):1369-1379. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez075.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies: an update.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 May;44(5):817-828. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Embryo Implantation.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 28;13:809596. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.809596. eCollection 2022.
4
Improved Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Beta-Thalassemia Using Spent Embryo Culture Medium Containing Blastocoelic Fluid.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 20;12:793821. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.793821. eCollection 2021.
6
7
The use of polygenic risk scores in pre-implantation genetic testing: an unproven, unethical practice.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 May;30(5):493-495. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-01000-x. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
8
Maternal and neonatal outcomes following blastocyst biopsy for PGT in single vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Jan;44(1):151-162. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.07.016. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
9
Mosaic human preimplantation embryos and their developmental potential in a prospective, non-selection clinical trial.
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Dec 2;108(12):2238-2247. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Prolonged Cryopreservation Negatively Affects Embryo Transfer Outcomes Following the Elective Freeze-All Strategy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 22;12:709648. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.709648. eCollection 2021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验